Teams

BC-MCC/AmySchmargen

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-12vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Digiaro / Kirsten Helvey vs Leslie Winston / Tara Aviel6-3, 6-3
2023-11-05vs BC-BJKTC/KatyWongLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda West / Kari Carpino vs Katherine Wong / Elena Salinas4-6, 0-6
2023-10-29vs BC-WestEnd/JulieMazorLost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Carpino / Erika Kemple vs Julie Mazor / Kim Silvera1-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaportLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathi Colligan / Kari Carpino vs Danielle Raymond / Jennifer Perkel5-7, 2-6
2023-10-15vs BC-MCC/KristieSherrillWon 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Helvey / Pamela Lopez vs Faye Cavanaugh / Theresa Vendetti6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-08vs BC-LLW-MCC/SarahSautotLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Digiaro / Kirsten Helvey vs Jeanette Chun / Monika Kiznis2-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs BC-Kramer/TanyaDrawerLost 02
L#1 DoublesRachel Alexander / Kirsten Helvey vs Tanya Drawer / Martha Zane2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Payne / Kari Carpino vs LENI GERASS / Amanda McCarthy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-17vs BC-SouthEnd/DebbieTranWon 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Helvey / Amy Digiaro vs Suzanne Scott / Debbie Tran6-2, 7-5
2023-09-09vs BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartiniLost 01
L#3 DoublesLora Penczar / Kari Carpino vs Anne DeMartini / Lisa Drexinger6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Pamela Lopez
published
3.63
Ellen Lauricella
published 4
3.47
Anne Gumm
published 3.5
3.28
Kari Carpino
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Leslie Lancry
published
3.27
Sandy Quigley
published
3.26
Caroline Payne
published 3.5
3.25
Amanda West
published 3.5
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
published
3.23
Amanda Gregory
published 3.5
3.19
Audra Steller
published 3.5
3.18
Lora Penczar
published
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
3.04
Amy Schmargen
published 3
3.00
Tiffany Chen
published
Martha Kretzmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda West + Janet Zuccarini044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Caroline Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Audra Steller123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Gregory + Caroline Payne123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Zuccarini + Lora Penczar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirsten Helvey
124W–71L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ellen Lauricella
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anne Gumm
67W–51L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kari Carpino
41W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Leslie Lancry
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Sandy Quigley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Caroline Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amanda Gregory
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Audra Steller
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Amy Schmargen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Tiffany Chen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Martha Kretzmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.