Teams

BC-Kramer/TanyaDrawer

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-12vs BC-MCC/KristieSherrillWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Jennifer Giordano vs Faye Cavanaugh / Ellen Hotchkis0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-11-05vs BC-LLW-MCC/SarahSautotWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanya Drawer / Jillian Panasewicz vs Laura Murray / Francia Zink2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-29vs BC-AltaVista/KarieLantermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanya Drawer / Gail Starinieri vs Betty Torng / Gretchen Albarian7-6, 6-4
2023-10-01vs BC-MCC/AmySchmargenWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Martha Zane vs Rachel Alexander / Kirsten Helvey6-2, 6-1
2023-09-24vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Allison Brandt vs Tara Aviel / Milagros Holub1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-17vs BC-BJKTC/KatyWongWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Jillian Panasewicz vs Katherine Wong / Jolina Cadilli6-2, 7-6
2023-09-10vs BC-WestEnd/JulieMazorWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Zane / Tanya Drawer vs Kim Silvera / Hazel Evans6-3, 6-2
2023-09-03vs BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaportWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Gail Starinieri vs Elizabeth Lujambio / Cynthia Percz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Amanda McCarthy
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Giordano
published
3.54
Tanya Drawer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.48
Deborah Fuentes
published 3.5
3.41
Gemma Lokier
published
3.32
Christine Ball
published 3.5
3.29
Gail Starinieri
published
Cynthia O'Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Colleen Post
published 3.5
3.23
Allison Brandt
published 3.5
3.22
Jillian Panasewicz
published
3.15
Pamela Tansavatdi
published 3.5
3.13
Tahereh Barnes
published
3.13
Sarah Robarts
published
3.12
Martha Zane
published
3.10
Julie Hadley
published
3.07
Lynn Abelson
published 3.5
3.01
Donna-Marie Ericson
published
LENI GERASS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Tansavatdi + Christine Ball6063% games+14.4% vs expected
Colleen Post + Martha Zane134 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Post + Gemma Lokier314 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Tansavatdi + Tanya Drawer123 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Drawer + Jennifer Giordano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda McCarthy
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Giordano
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Tanya Drawer
106W–90L career · 10 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Deborah Fuentes
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Gemma Lokier
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Christine Ball
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Gail Starinieri
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Cynthia O'Reilly
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Post
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Allison Brandt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jillian Panasewicz
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Pamela Tansavatdi
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Tahereh Barnes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sarah Robarts
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Martha Zane
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Julie Hadley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lynn Abelson
49W–79L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Donna-Marie Ericson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
LENI GERASS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.