Teams

ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CLUB

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 4.5 MEN- 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.56 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-05vs SPANISH OAKSWon 21
W#2 DoublesMatthew Mims / Ric Newell vs Terrance Nichols / Allen Tang5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJason Schrock vs Jason Schieck6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / David Kartzinel vs Kevin Barney / Kyle Clingo6-2, 7-6
2021-05-22vs DTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Mims / Ric Newell vs Shane Littlefield / Ehsan Kaveh6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Theobald / Paul Hollander vs Josh Benson / Allen Morgan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / Jeff Ng vs Sam Cole / Stephane Chartrand6-2, 6-3
2021-05-15vs TPCWon 21
W#1 SinglesPaul Hollander vs Lenny Badger6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / Jason Schrock vs Kevin McPartlin / Dmitriy Kosyagin7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Barr / Ernest Oon vs Jonathan Fragoso / David Altfas6-1, 6-2
2021-05-08vs SPANISH TRAILWon 20
W#1 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / JOHN PAUL BROWNE vs Ivaylo Petkov / Andrew Manson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Kartzinel / Paul Hollander vs James Russell / Adrian Selby6-4, 6-1
2021-05-01vs RED ROCK CCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Farber / David Kartzinel vs Fernando Dipalma / Cruz Colmenares3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErnest Oon / Michael Catalano vs Mark Norman / Nick Nardiello6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-24vs DESERT PALMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / Mark Taylor vs Ever Nemuel Cambe / Reynaldo David6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Kartzinel / Paul Hollander vs Hansel Fontelera / Jun Ellano0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-17vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSLost 03
L#1 DoublesErnest Oon / Michael Catalano vs David Morgan / Derek Hillman6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Farber / Paul Theobald vs Attila Tokay / Kevin Howard4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Mims / Ric Newell vs Christopher Kaeser / Bach Nguyen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-10vs DTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Farber / David Kartzinel vs Allen Morgan / Josh Benson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJason Schrock / Paul Hollander vs David Dendy / Tom Gosnell5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-03-27vs SPANISH OAKSSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / JOHN PAUL BROWNE vs Kyle Clingo / James Mori6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCharles Farber / Paul Hollander vs Monty Lapica / Jason Schieck6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-20vs TPCWon 20
W#1 DoublesErnest Oon / Charles Farber vs David Altfas / Dmitriy Kosyagin6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJawaid Motiwala / Paul Hollander vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 MEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Matthew Mims
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.38
Ernest Oon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Adam Barr
published 5
Charles Farber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
JOHN PAUL BROWNE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Jawaid Motiwala
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.08
David Kartzinel
published 4.5
4.07
Paul Hollander
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.84
Jason Schrock
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Jeff Ng
published
Jeffrey Lavigne
published
Matthew Rodgers
published
Michael Catalano
published
Paul Theobald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Farber + Michael Catalano6356% games+9.2% vs expected
David Kartzinel + Paul Theobald5451% games+0.9% vs expected
Ernest Oon + Charles Farber9262% games+0.1% vs expected
Paul Hollander + David Kartzinel5359% games−2.1% vs expected
Ernest Oon + Paul Hollander4168% gamesnot enough data
JOHN PAUL BROWNE + Jeff Ng2343% gamesnot enough data
Ernest Oon + Michael Catalano224 matchesnot enough data
Jawaid Motiwala + Jeff Ng123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Matthew Mims
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
4.46
4.5
Ernest Oon
93W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
5
Adam Barr
73W–46L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
4.27
4.5
Charles Farber
88W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
JOHN PAUL BROWNE
45W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Jawaid Motiwala
70W–73L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
David Kartzinel
31W–27L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Paul Hollander
145W–112L career · 7 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Jason Schrock
49W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
Jeff Ng
77W–92L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Jeffrey Lavigne
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Rodgers
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Catalano
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Theobald
30W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.