← Search

Jawaid Motiwala

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
143 matches · 70W–73L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
35%
down to 4.0
65%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 21% down · 79% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.07. Higher than today’s 4.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
21 of 39
NV · 4.5
32 of 61

Jawaid is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jawaid has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jawaid has gone from the 14th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
50.4%
65W–64L · 51% of games
5.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.8% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
Michael Catalano / Riley Stahley
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaden Tiriolo
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Philip Tompkins / Shaun Yokoyama
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vincent Tessier
−0.013below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Mike Fitzpatrick / Kyle Knecht
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andy Fouche
+0.032better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Josh Benson / Philip Tompkins
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Majid Mirzazadeh
+0.021better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Kevin Barney / Mark Sylvain
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaden Tiriolo
+0.013better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Costa Felix
−0.059below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Aaron Harris / Kyle Clingo
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quang Bui
+0.014better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
David Kartzinel / Paul Hollander
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jean-Francois Blais
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven McCrary
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kevin Barney / Mark Sylvain
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quang Bui
−0.058below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Paul Joncich / Daniel Dragnev
2025-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven McCrary
−0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Rasmussen
+0.055better than expected — took 56% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.