Teams

NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 9.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-10vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJim Woodruff / Scott Hulick vs Scott Leonard / Mark Davis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCurtis Neeld / David Harnick vs Richard Barker / Galen Garcia6-3, 7-5
2023-06-03vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCurtis Neeld / Brad Allpass vs Matthew Barker / Key Sanders7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJim Woodruff / Bob Gonzalez vs Galen Garcia / Paul Black6-3, 6-4
2023-05-21vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthWon 21
L#1 DoublesCurtis Neeld / Brad Allpass vs Drew McDermott / Key Sanders6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMike Sandoval / Timothy Draelos vs Chris Walker / Roger Hamilton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Cummings / Thomas Kratochvil vs Jon Bloodworth / Richard Barker6-1, 7-5
2023-05-07vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthWon 21
W#1 DoublesCurtis Neeld / Scott Hulick vs Matthew Barker / Chris Walker6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMike Sandoval / Thomas Kratochvil vs Drew McDermott / Paul Wantuck6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJim Woodruff / Douglas Oltmans vs Richard Barker / Paul Black1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-30vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Kratochvil / Timothy Draelos vs Paul Wantuck / Mark Davis6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Allpass / Scott Hulick vs Matthew Barker / Drew McDermott6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDoug MacCurdy / David Harnick vs Key Sanders / Roger Hamilton4-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthWon 21
W#1 DoublesCurtis Neeld / Brad Allpass vs Richard Barker / Scott Leonard7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMike Sandoval / Timothy Draelos vs Matthew Barker / Galen Garcia6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Kratochvil / David Harnick vs Mark Davis / Key Sanders1-6, 3-6
2023-04-16vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthLost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Woodruff / Thomas Kratochvil vs Timothy Garcia / Galen Garcia6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDoug MacCurdy / Douglas Oltmans vs Mark Davis / Key Sanders1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Cummings / Bob Gonzalez vs Matthew Barker / Drew McDermott1-6, 0-6
2023-04-02vs NNM 9.0M SFTS - BloodworthWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrad Allpass / Jim Woodruff vs Matthew Barker / Galen Garcia6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Harnick / Scott Hulick vs Richard Barker / Drew McDermott7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Sandoval / Timothy Draelos vs Mark Davis / Paul Wantuck7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Woodruff/55 & Over/9.0M62141021213
2NNM 9.0M SFTS - Bloodworth26101430228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Curtis Neeld
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.18
Jeff Cummings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Jim Woodruff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.10
Thomas Kratochvil
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Scott Hulick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Mike Sandoval
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Bob Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Doug MacCurdy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Douglas Oltmans
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.66
David Harnick
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Brad Allpass
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Timothy Draelos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Kratochvil + Scott Hulick4354% games+9.5% vs expected
Brad Allpass + Jim Woodruff4451% games+5.7% vs expected
Brad Allpass + Curtis Neeld3353% games+2.9% vs expected
Brad Allpass + Jeff Cummings7153% games−2.1% vs expected
David Harnick + Scott Hulick3248% games−5.0% vs expected
Thomas Kratochvil + Jeff Cummings3746% games−6.9% vs expected
Scott Hulick + Jeff Cummings3448% games−7.6% vs expected
Bob Gonzalez + Jeff Cummings0933% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Curtis Neeld
36W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Cummings
53W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
Jim Woodruff
49W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Thomas Kratochvil
62W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
Scott Hulick
80W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
Mike Sandoval
30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Bob Gonzalez
25W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Doug MacCurdy
4W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Douglas Oltmans
49W–60L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Harnick
70W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Brad Allpass
23W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Draelos
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.