Teams

DAVIE STADIUM 55AM9.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Men 9.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Curtis Dunn
published 5
4.33
Doug Ditmer
published
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.29
Caesar Ladion
published 4.5
4.27
David Richmond
published 4.5
4.24
Brian Barlay
published 4.5
4.23
Roman Olmos
published
4.12
Richard Chapman
published
4.10
Glenn Teixeira
published
4.08
Carlito Llavanes
published 4.5
4.07
4.04
Martin Manqueros
published
4.02
David Meacham
published 4.5
3.90
Phil Beilin
published
3.86
Michael Rennels
published
3.79
Anton Hofmann
published 4
3.78
Bruno Walker
published 4
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
published
3.64
John Honey
published
Ole Hoefelmann
published
Rick Kepler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rennels + Samuel Pleasure213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Curtis Dunn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.82
Doug Ditmer
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 10 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.29
4.5
Caesar Ladion
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
David Richmond
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Brian Barlay
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Richard Chapman
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
Glenn Teixeira
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Carlito Llavanes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.08
Stephen Wullschleger
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
Martin Manqueros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
David Meacham
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Phil Beilin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
Michael Rennels
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Anton Hofmann
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Bruno Walker
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
John Honey
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Ole Hoefelmann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rick Kepler
18W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.