Teams

Green-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chandler-CC53221844356
2Green-CC26172351372
3Vaughn-GI26122859404

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Andi Lee
published 4.5
3.99
Annie Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.91
Munkyung Kim
published
3.69
Jill Kemp
published
3.68
Haesook Joo
published 4
3.57
Melissa Foy
published
3.47
Leco Hutson
published
3.41
Jeeyoung Kim
published
3.39
Kerri Medders
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Crystal Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Victoria Green
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Malgorzata Zezula Gayler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Lissa Mummert
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
LJ Shirley
published
Tracey Kiser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Medders + Melissa Foy152051% games+9.4% vs expected
Crystal Wilson + Annie Kirkland3351% games+6.6% vs expected
Kerri Medders + Crystal Wilson4161% games+4.4% vs expected
Victoria Green + Crystal Wilson3351% games+2.9% vs expected
Victoria Green + Annie Kirkland6059% games+2.3% vs expected
Andi Lee + Jeeyoung Kim4253% games+2.2% vs expected
Andi Lee + Munkyung Kim211058% games+0.0% vs expected
Haesook Joo + Crystal Wilson3547% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andi Lee
91W–34L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Annie Kirkland
118W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Munkyung Kim
94W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jill Kemp
28W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Haesook Joo
31W–38L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Melissa Foy
47W–77L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Leco Hutson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Jeeyoung Kim
36W–48L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
Kerri Medders
55W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Crystal Wilson
100W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Victoria Green
78W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Malgorzata Zezula Gayler
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Lissa Mummert
29W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
LJ Shirley
5W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Kiser
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.