Teams

Bellas

2024 18&Over Women Spring · Summer

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-31vs RoyalsWon 10
W#1 SinglesVidesha Joshi vs Olinda Fuda6-1, 6-4
2024-05-17vs RoyalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Bastiani / HELENE ACQUAVELLA vs Olinda Fuda / Lori Littenberg1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJan Low Chase / Shachee Pandya vs Susan Walsh / Jan Seaman1-6, 0-6
2024-05-03vs RoyalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Bastiani / Padma Himbaravalli Vamadevarao vs Julie Burg / Susan Walsh4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJane Sherry vs Olinda Fuda1-6, 0-6
2024-04-26vs RoyalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Sherry / Videsha Joshi vs Lori Littenberg / Kristen Barbara5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShruti Kumari Panwar vs Olinda Fuda2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Bastiani / Shachee Pandya vs Susan Walsh / Stacey Koopman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-19vs RoyalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Bastiani / HELENE ACQUAVELLA vs Susan Walsh / Jan Seaman6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Sherry vs Julie Burg6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiana Voshchinsky / Shachee Pandya vs Kristen Barbara / Stacey Koopman4-6, 3-6
2024-04-12vs RoyalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCristina Tarantino / Orleese Phillips vs Susan Walsh / Lori Littenberg3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Sherry vs Olinda Fuda3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHELENE ACQUAVELLA / Angela Bastiani vs Jan Seaman / Stacey Koopman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Royals601627104
2Bellas0621632204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Videsha Joshi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Angela Bastiani
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Cristina Tarantino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Shruti Kumari Panwar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
HELENE ACQUAVELLA
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Sherry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shachee Pandya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Tarantino + Jane Sherry0616% games−14.8% vs expected
HELENE ACQUAVELLA + Angela Bastiani033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Videsha Joshi
25W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Angela Bastiani
0W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cristina Tarantino
0W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shruti Kumari Panwar
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
HELENE ACQUAVELLA
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jane Sherry
3W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shachee Pandya
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.