Teams

Royals

2024 18&Over Women Spring · Summer

6 players · average NTRP / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-31vs BellasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Littenberg / Kristen Barbara vs Orleese Phillips / Jan Low Chase6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesOlinda Fuda vs Videsha Joshi1-6, 4-6
2024-05-17vs BellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesOlinda Fuda / Lori Littenberg vs Angela Bastiani / HELENE ACQUAVELLA6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Burg vs Orleese Phillips6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Walsh / Jan Seaman vs Jan Low Chase / Shachee Pandya6-1, 6-0
2024-05-03vs BellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Burg / Susan Walsh vs Angela Bastiani / Padma Himbaravalli Vamadevarao6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOlinda Fuda vs Jane Sherry6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Koopman / Jan Seaman vs Diana Voshchinsky / Jan Low Chase7-5, 6-0
2024-04-26vs BellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Littenberg / Kristen Barbara vs Jane Sherry / Videsha Joshi7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesOlinda Fuda vs Shruti Kumari Panwar6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Walsh / Stacey Koopman vs Angela Bastiani / Shachee Pandya4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-19vs BellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Walsh / Jan Seaman vs Angela Bastiani / HELENE ACQUAVELLA4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Burg vs Jane Sherry4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Barbara / Stacey Koopman vs Diana Voshchinsky / Shachee Pandya6-4, 6-3
2024-04-12vs BellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Walsh / Lori Littenberg vs Cristina Tarantino / Orleese Phillips6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesOlinda Fuda vs Jane Sherry6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJan Seaman / Stacey Koopman vs HELENE ACQUAVELLA / Angela Bastiani4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Royals601627104
2Bellas0621632204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.74 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

1.74
Olinda Fuda
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jan Seaman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Julie Burg
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Barbara
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Littenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stacey Koopman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Littenberg + Kristen Barbara404 matchesnot enough data
Jan Seaman + Stacey Koopman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olinda Fuda
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Jan Seaman
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Burg
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Barbara
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Littenberg
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Koopman
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.