Teams

LOTA/Scott Hein

2026 LOTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Men - Spring · Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-03vs LOTA/Rick AndersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Dagley / Wesley Wetherington vs Paul Miller / Rick Anderson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTod Gettys / Joe Owen vs Steve Pond / David Atala6-2, 7-5
2026-04-26vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Leighton / Frederick Lovely vs Leslie Vernon / Jonathan Farr6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Hein / Quinn Thomas vs James Robertson / Victor Reinert6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWesley Wetherington / Erik Jorgensen vs Mark Shurett / Dale Kirby6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-19vs LOTA/Mark WatkinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Dagley / Rick Leighton vs Carlos Lozano / JR Carreras6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTom Underwood / Frederick Lovely vs Scott Bradway / George Jennings4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Surratt / Joe Owen vs Bill Massa / Brian Buttrick7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-15vs LOTA/Rick AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Surratt / Joe Owen vs Rick Anderson / Paul Miller6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrederick Lovely / Charles Lucius vs Steve Pond / David Atala6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTod Gettys / Quinn Thomas vs Luis Henao / Robert Fasnacht6-1, 6-2
2026-03-30vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Underwood / Quinn Thomas vs Jonathan Farr / Leslie Vernon3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Dagley / Mark Watson vs James Robertson / Greg Webb6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Hein / Frederick Lovely vs Thomas Newton / Mark Shurett6-2, 6-3
2026-03-22vs LOTA/Mark WatkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Surratt / Tom Underwood vs George Jennings / Scott Bradway7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTod Gettys / Joe Owen vs Brian Buttrick / Bill Massa6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesQuinn Thomas / Mark Watson vs Roger Fields / John Howard6-2, 6-4
2026-03-19vs LOTA/Rick AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Watson / David Surratt vs Rick Anderson / Paul Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTod Gettys / James Dagley vs Matthew McBride / Steve Pond6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRick Leighton / Wesley Wetherington vs Robert Fasnacht / Ted Westlake6-4, 6-2
2026-03-15vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Surratt / Tod Gettys vs Thomas Newton / Leslie Vernon7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Leighton / Joe Owen vs David Sandfelder / Victor Reinert6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Dagley / Charles Lucius vs Gregory Bell / Mark Shurett6-1, 6-2
2026-03-01vs LOTA/Mark WatkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Surratt / Tom Underwood vs Scott Bradway / George Jennings3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRick Leighton / Joe Owen vs Richard Settles / Scott Joris6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWesley Wetherington / Charles Lucius vs Roger Fields / Mark Street6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Quinn Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Mark Watson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
David Surratt
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Rick Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Joe Owen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.37
Frederick Lovely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Tom Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Tod Gettys
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Charles Lucius
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
James Dagley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Wesley Wetherington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Hein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Underwood + David Surratt123 matchesnot enough data
Joe Owen + David Surratt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Quinn Thomas
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Mark Watson
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
David Surratt
8W–3L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rick Leighton
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Joe Owen
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Frederick Lovely
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
Tom Underwood
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Tod Gettys
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Charles Lucius
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
James Dagley
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Wesley Wetherington
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Scott Hein
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.