Teams

LOTA/Mark Watkins

2026 LOTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Men - Spring · Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-03vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Wakely / Brian Buttrick vs Thomas Newton / Jonathan Farr6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Street / David Ferrarini vs James Robertson / Greg Webb6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs LOTA/Rick AndersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoger Fields / David Ferrarini vs Rick Anderson / Paul Miller3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Wakely / Mark Street vs Steve Pond / David Atala6-1, 6-2
2026-04-19vs LOTA/Scott HeinWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarlos Lozano / JR Carreras vs James Dagley / Rick Leighton1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesScott Bradway / George Jennings vs Tom Underwood / Frederick Lovely6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Massa / Brian Buttrick vs David Surratt / Joe Owen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-12vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Jennings / Mark Street vs Thomas Newton / Leslie Vernon6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Buttrick / Scott Joris vs Victor Reinert / Mark Shurett6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarlos Lozano / Michael Shannon vs James Robertson / Dale Kirby6-2, 6-2
2026-03-29vs LOTA/Rick AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesBill Massa / Brian Buttrick vs Rick Anderson / Paul Miller6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRoger Fields / Mark Street vs Matthew McBride / Robert Fasnacht6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Settles / JR Carreras vs Steve Pond / David Atala6-2, 6-3
2026-03-22vs LOTA/Scott HeinWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Jennings / Scott Bradway vs David Surratt / Tom Underwood5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Buttrick / Bill Massa vs Tod Gettys / Joe Owen7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRoger Fields / John Howard vs Quinn Thomas / Mark Watson2-6, 4-6
2026-03-17vs LOTA/Thomas NewtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Jennings / Mark Street vs Jonathan Farr / Leslie Vernon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRoger Fields / Michael Shannon vs James Robertson / Greg Webb6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Settles / Mark Watkins vs Thomas Newton / Dale Kirby6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-10vs LOTA/Rick AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Bradway / George Jennings vs Rick Anderson / Ted Westlake6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBill Massa / Mark Street vs Paul Miller / Len Forner7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRoger Fields / Carlos Lozano vs Steve Pond / Matthew McBride7-6, 6-2
2026-03-01vs LOTA/Scott HeinWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Bradway / George Jennings vs David Surratt / Tom Underwood6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Settles / Scott Joris vs Rick Leighton / Joe Owen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Fields / Mark Street vs Wesley Wetherington / Charles Lucius7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
George Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.54
Brian Buttrick
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.51
Scott Bradway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Mark Street
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Bill Massa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Roger Fields
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Charles Wakely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Ferrarini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Richard Settles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Carlos Lozano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
JR Carreras
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Joris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Jennings + Scott Bradway404 matchesnot enough data
Bill Massa + Brian Buttrick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Jennings
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Brian Buttrick
5W–0L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Scott Bradway
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Mark Street
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Bill Massa
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Roger Fields
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Charles Wakely
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
David Ferrarini
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Settles
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carlos Lozano
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
JR Carreras
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Shannon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Joris
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.