Teams

C 6.5W AO1 Benevento

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-15vs C 6.5W KI TrivisonnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrigid O'Neil / Kaitlin Mccready vs Kate Biggar / Jackie Spoth5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Langhenry / Caroline Zuchold vs Elyse Lightner / Lita Laven0-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs C 6.5W AO2 PeckoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Langhenry / Colleen Thaxton Spencer vs Kristen Boll / Karen Kariotakis0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Slater / Susan Benevento vs Paula Pecko / Julie Spintzyk2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Balch / Andrea Wilson vs MEGAN EDGEHOUSE / Olga Bencini1-6, 1-6
2025-10-12vs C 6.5W KI TrivisonnoLost 03
L#1 DoublesCateErin Gisser-Karaba / Allison Babiuch vs Nikki Trivisonno / Nicole Fioritto6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Balch / Susan Benevento vs Abigail T. / Lynda Brandal6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelsey Nicole Jeffery / Sara Loomer vs Megan Monticello / Shelly Rieple2-6, 4-6
2025-09-20vs C 6.5W AO2 PeckoLost 03
L#1 DoublesMikayla Medved / Colleen Thaxton Spencer vs Courtney Harrigan / Krystal Massey0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Roche / Patricia Balch vs Sheryl Martin / Sandra Neustadtl2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelsey Nicole Jeffery / Andrea Wilson vs Marla Schmidt / Olga Bencini1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Megan Slater
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
CateErin Gisser-Karaba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brigid O'Neil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Babiuch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Mikayla Medved
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Kaitlin Mccready
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kelsey Nicole Jeffery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Susan Benevento
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Liza Smith
published
2.53
Colleen Thaxton Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Patricia Balch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Caroline Zuchold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.14
Jenifer Walsh
published
1.89
Sara Loomer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gretchen Losey
published
Kim Langhenry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Molly Roche
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Benevento + Colleen Thaxton Spencer4250% games+1.4% vs expected
Patricia Balch + Susan Benevento01232% games−10.5% vs expected
Megan Slater + CateErin Gisser-Karaba5160% gamesnot enough data
Susan Benevento + Caroline Zuchold1440% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Balch + Caroline Zuchold134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Benevento + Kelsey Nicole Jeffery314 matchesnot enough data
Liza Smith + Kelsey Nicole Jeffery224 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Balch + Kelsey Nicole Jeffery123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Slater
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
CateErin Gisser-Karaba
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brigid O'Neil
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Allison Babiuch
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Mikayla Medved
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kaitlin Mccready
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kelsey Nicole Jeffery
29W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Chann Fowler-Spellman
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Benevento
16W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Liza Smith
8W–31L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Colleen Thaxton Spencer
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Patricia Balch
11W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Caroline Zuchold
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Jenifer Walsh
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sara Loomer
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Gretchen Losey
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Langhenry
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Roche
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.