Teams

C 6.5W KI Trivisonno

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-23vs C 6.5W AO2 PeckoWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Kelsey Ruddock vs Kristen Boll / Bethany Prendes6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKate Biggar / Megan Monticello vs Megan Glass / Sheryl Martin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicole Fioritto / Susan Gorjup vs Julie Spintzyk / Sandra Neustadtl6-1, 6-1
2025-11-15vs C 6.5W AO1 BeneventoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Biggar / Jackie Spoth vs Brigid O'Neil / Kaitlin Mccready7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElyse Lightner / Lita Laven vs Kim Langhenry / Caroline Zuchold6-0, 6-1
2025-11-09vs C 6.5W MV1 KirchickLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Biggar / Hope Ziegler vs Eileen Connell / Kelly Jordan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelsey Ruddock / Lynda Brandal vs Laura Hyres / Rebecca Drenovsky4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Eileen Linz vs Holly Vanjo / Xiaozhong Men5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs C 6.5W CV2 FergusonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynda Brandal / Libby Freeman vs Trish Landsman / Ivana Urbanowski6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJumana Wilson / Andrea Malone vs Sharon Prindle / Casey Krenn4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Gorjup / Meghan Walsh vs Shelley Beebe / Katy Donohue4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-26vs C 6.5W TRR GayerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynda Brandal / Nikki Trivisonno vs Jamisen Newman / Mary Stenger6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSara Schaefer / Eileen Linz vs Elizabeth Gayer / Sarah Ginn4-6, 5-7
2025-10-17vs C 6.5W AO2 PeckoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Biggar / Lynda Brandal vs Courtney Harrigan / Krystal Massey7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJackie Spoth / Kelsey Ruddock vs Kristen Boll / Linda Bates2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Linz / Susan Gorjup vs Shannon Carey / Olga Bencini1-6, 5-7
2025-10-12vs C 6.5W AO1 BeneventoWon 30
W#1 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Nicole Fioritto vs CateErin Gisser-Karaba / Allison Babiuch7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAbigail T. / Lynda Brandal vs Patricia Balch / Susan Benevento2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Monticello / Shelly Rieple vs Kelsey Nicole Jeffery / Sara Loomer6-2, 6-4
2025-10-05vs C 6.5W MV1 KirchickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynda Brandal / Julie Visconsi vs VIctoria Ung / Denise Hwang3-4
W#2 DoublesElyse Lightner / Lita Laven vs Lynn Sands / Donna Fleming6-4, 6-1
2025-09-27vs C 6.5W CV2 FergusonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynda Brandal / Shelly Rieple vs Kathy Mallak / Ivana Urbanowski4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Malone / Lita Laven vs Sandi Ferguson / Lynn Sandstrom2-6, 4-6
2025-09-21vs C 6.5W TRR GayerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Biggar / Abigail T. vs Kirsten Oravec / Rebecca Dworakowski6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Libby Freeman vs Sarah Ginn / Elizabeth Gayer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Walsh / Sara Schaefer vs Samantha Mansour / Claudia Lewis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elyse Lightner
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Kelsey Ruddock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Nicole Fioritto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Libby Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Andrea Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Lynda Brandal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.05
Sara Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Hope Ziegler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Eileen Linz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Meghan Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Shelly Rieple
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Abigail T.
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Nikki Trivisonno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Jackie Spoth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Susan Gorjup
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lita Laven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Jumana Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Visconsi
published
Kate Biggar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Margaret Lencewicz
published
Megan Monticello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Ziegler + Lynda Brandal7072% games+20.2% vs expected
Hope Ziegler + Nikki Trivisonno10267% games+16.4% vs expected
Lynda Brandal + Nikki Trivisonno6650% games+4.4% vs expected
Lynda Brandal + Jackie Spoth5069% gamesnot enough data
Elyse Lightner + Kelsey Ruddock314 matchesnot enough data
Hope Ziegler + Shelly Rieple224 matchesnot enough data
Hope Ziegler + Jackie Spoth224 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Brandal + Shelly Rieple314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elyse Lightner
33W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Ruddock
35W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Nicole Fioritto
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Libby Freeman
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Andrea Malone
40W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Lynda Brandal
40W–17L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Sara Schaefer
49W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Hope Ziegler
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Eileen Linz
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Meghan Walsh
47W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Shelly Rieple
16W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Abigail T.
10W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Trivisonno
27W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Jackie Spoth
18W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Gorjup
54W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Lita Laven
17W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Jumana Wilson
22W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Julie Visconsi
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Biggar
10W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Lencewicz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Monticello
11W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.