Teams

MEMPK TREVISO

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-27vs CCW BRACHFELDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Claus / Craig Rogers vs Paul Young / Daniel Michon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobert Droke / Greg Treviso vs Larry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTim Campbell / Sheldon Chinnery vs George York / William Tostanoski6-3, 6-2
2022-06-20vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Droke / Kelly McCarthy vs Mark Hutter / Frank Johnson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Claus / Craig Rogers vs Doug Baker / Tony Adkison6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Greg Treviso vs Bruce Wadman / Michael White6-0, 6-2
2022-06-13vs MEMPK CORDASCOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Claus / Greg Treviso vs Michael Bagwell / Conrad Fitz4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeorge Woolley / Kelly McCarthy vs Joseph D Sawyer / Michael Perez-Mesa6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Bernard Zipp vs Steve Nickless / Jeff Davis7-5, 6-4
2022-06-06vs CCW BRACHFELDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Claus / Peter Holnback vs John Johlfs / David StClair2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly McCarthy / George Woolley vs Larry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Warren / Sheldon Chinnery vs Daniel Michon / Paul Gustafson6-7, 5-7
2022-06-03vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 21
L#1 DoublesCraig Rogers / Kelly McCarthy vs Frank Johnson / Mark Hutter2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Claus / Bernard Zipp vs Jon Dickey / Michael White6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Woolley / Greg Treviso vs William Asiano / John Woo Ra6-4, 6-3
2022-05-16vs MEMPK CORDASCOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Claus / Craig Rogers vs Joseph D Sawyer / Michael Perez-Mesa6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Holnback / Tim Campbell vs Jeff Davis / Conrad Fitz1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Warren / Daniel Bisanti vs Brett Matheson / Fernando Urbina6-4, 7-6
2022-05-09vs CCW BRACHFELDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Claus / Craig Rogers vs Larry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Treviso / Bernard Zipp vs Paul Gustafson / George York6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGeorge Woolley / Daniel Bisanti vs William Tostanoski / Daniel Michon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-02vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 12
W#1 DoublesGreg Treviso / Craig Rogers vs Tony Adkison / Doug Baker6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Campbell / Kelly McCarthy vs Michael White / Jon Dickey1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSheldon Chinnery / George Woolley vs Frank Johnson / Mark Hutter0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Craig Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.92
Kelly McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Bernard Zipp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
John Claus
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.62
Greg Treviso
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
George Woolley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.50
Daniel Bisanti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Robert Droke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Holnback
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sheldon Chinnery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Claus + Craig Rogers16461% games+5.0% vs expected
Greg Treviso + John Claus5352% gamesnot enough data
Greg Treviso + Daniel Bisanti5257% gamesnot enough data
Greg Treviso + George Woolley224 matchesnot enough data
Craig Rogers + Kelly McCarthy314 matchesnot enough data
Greg Treviso + Craig Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
George Woolley + Kelly McCarthy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Rogers
51W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Kelly McCarthy
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Bernard Zipp
13W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Claus
26W–13L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Greg Treviso
21W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
George Woolley
18W–9L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Daniel Bisanti
69W–39L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Robert Droke
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Peter Holnback
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheldon Chinnery
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.