Teams

CCW BRACHFELD

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-27vs MEMPK TREVISOLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Young / Daniel Michon vs John Claus / Craig Rogers2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux vs Robert Droke / Greg Treviso4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge York / William Tostanoski vs Tim Campbell / Sheldon Chinnery3-6, 2-6
2022-06-20vs MEMPK CORDASCOLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Johlfs / Paul Young vs Michael Perez-Mesa / Joseph D Sawyer3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLarry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux vs Michael Bagwell / Mark McCadden7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Bugno / William Tostanoski vs John Cordasco / Scott Parker1-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Johlfs / David StClair vs Curt Linke / Frank Johnson0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Daniel Michon vs Mark Hutter / Michael White3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBruce Bugno / George York vs Tony Adkison / Doug Baker7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-06vs MEMPK TREVISOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Johlfs / David StClair vs John Claus / Peter Holnback6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLarry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux vs Kelly McCarthy / George Woolley3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Michon / Paul Gustafson vs David Warren / Sheldon Chinnery7-6, 7-5
2022-06-02vs MEMPK CORDASCOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid StClair / Daniel Michon vs Fernando Urbina / Jeff Davis6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Bruce Bugno vs John Cordasco / John Shepard3-6, 6-7
2022-05-16vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Johlfs / Paul Young vs Frank Johnson / Curt Linke3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / David StClair vs Michael White / Jon Dickey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Bugno / George York vs John Woo Ra / William Asiano2-6, 3-6
2022-05-09vs MEMPK TREVISOLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux vs John Claus / Craig Rogers3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Gustafson / George York vs Greg Treviso / Bernard Zipp3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Tostanoski / Daniel Michon vs George Woolley / Daniel Bisanti3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-02vs MEMPK CORDASCOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Johlfs / George York vs Scott Parker / Mark McCadden7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLarry Brachfeld / Jeff Mailloux vs Joseph D Sawyer / Michael Perez-Mesa6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Michon / Paul Gustafson vs Brett Matheson / Fernando Urbina5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Daniel Michon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
David StClair
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Larry Brachfeld
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
George York
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Jeff Mailloux
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.22
Paul Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Bruce Bugno
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
William Tostanoski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Johlfs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Michon + Jeff Mailloux4549% games−14.3% vs expected
Larry Brachfeld + Jeff Mailloux0543% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Mailloux + David StClair2343% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Mailloux + George York4154% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Bugno + William Tostanoski044 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Bugno + Paul Gustafson224 matchesnot enough data
William Tostanoski + Paul Gustafson044 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Bugno + George York213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Michon
98W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
David StClair
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Brachfeld
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
George York
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Jeff Mailloux
18W–30L career · 8 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Paul Gustafson
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Bruce Bugno
17W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
William Tostanoski
19W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
John Johlfs
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.