Teams

11 Willow Oaks Sampson

2021 Richmond Combo Weekend · Combo Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Laura Granger
published 4.5
3.73
Yancey Haas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Ingrid Hale
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.37
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.10
Anne-Marie Anderson
published 3.5
3.07
Zinie Sampson
published
2.82
Anne Scher
published 3
2.66
Beth Kelly
published 3
Meda Lane
published
Nan McKenney
published
Nikki Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Hale + Yancey Haas9654% gamesnot enough data
Meda Lane + Beth Kelly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Yancey Haas
166W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ingrid Hale
88W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Anne-Marie Anderson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
Meda Lane
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nan McKenney
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nikki Powell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.