Teams

TOC.Rarangol

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-27vs TOC.ByrdLost 01
L#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Prasanna Chandramohan6-7, 1-6
2025-04-06vs TOC.ByrneLost 02
L#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Thomas Newton2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesYee Nguyen / Alex Bryan vs Nick Byrne / Jagan Puttoju3-6, 3-6
2025-04-04vs TOC.AKumarWon 10
W#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Naga Mahesh Desu6-3, 6-3
2025-03-30vs TOC.SachanWon 10
W#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Amit Sachan7-6, 6-2
2025-03-09vs TING.TandonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Santosh Voruganti6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrendan OConnor / Yee Nguyen vs Rishi Tandon / Deep Phuyal1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-02vs PW.MesserLost 02
L#1 DoublesLuke Gillenwater / Yee Nguyen vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Mitchell Miller2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Brad Land4-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs TOC.XiaoWon 10
W#1 SinglesNathan Rarangol vs Yunxiang Zhu6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Nathan Rarangol
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Joe Park
published
3.17
Luke Gillenwater
published
3.15
Yee Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Yuxu Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Brendan OConnor
published 3
2.59
Alex Bryan
published 3
Sandeep Sharma
published
Steve Bowman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Gillenwater + Yee Nguyen5077% games+17.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathan Rarangol
18W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Joe Park
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Luke Gillenwater
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Yee Nguyen
63W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Yuxu Yang
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Brendan OConnor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alex Bryan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Sandeep Sharma
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Bowman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.