Teams

TOC.AKumar

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-16vs TING.TandonWon 10
W#1 SinglesAvinash Matam vs Alay Patel3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-27vs TOC.XiaoLost 02
L#2 SinglesRavi Karanam vs Vasyl Kapitan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMahesh Salian / Vivek Kalanadhabhatla vs Elvin Eng / Ashutosh Chaudhari6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesMahesh Salian / Pranav Dawda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-04vs TOC.RarangolWon 20
W#1 DoublesRANDEEP BASU / Pranav Dawda vs John Strang / Alex Bryan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMahesh Salian / Vivek Kalanadhabhatla vs Joe Park / Yuxu Yang5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-02vs TOC.SachanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRANDEEP BASU vs Vidit Desai7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArun Kumar / Ravi Karanam vs Shiv Giri / Anjaneya Tiwari0-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs TOC.ByrneWon 21
W#1 DoublesArun Kumar / RANDEEP BASU vs Nick Byrne / Thomas Newton6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRavi Karanam vs Anthony Rizzuto0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMahesh Salian / Manik Parsa vs Jagan Puttoju / Kaushik Vemulapalli6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
RANDEEP BASU
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Mahesh Salian
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Avinash Matam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Snehansu Roy
published
3.13
Manik Parsa
published
3.12
Naga Mahesh Desu
published
3.06
Nathan Naramor
published
2.87
Ravi Karanam
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

RANDEEP BASU + Mahesh Salian4455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
RANDEEP BASU
63W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Mahesh Salian
66W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Avinash Matam
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Snehansu Roy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Manik Parsa
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
Naga Mahesh Desu
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Nathan Naramor
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Ravi Karanam
36W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.