Teams

Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Curtiss

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Mixed · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland000000
2Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Jackson000000
3Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Lewis000000
4Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Curtiss000000
5Indy CX 7.5 MRC Vanator000000
6Indy CX 7.5 CRC Kim000000
7Indy CX 7.5 CRC Nelson000000
8Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Cook000000
9Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly000000
10Indy CX 7.5 IUTC Nguyen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Laura Grable
published
3.65
Cliff Dickinson
published 4
3.61
JASON RICHMOND
published
3.54
Jill Davidson
published
3.48
Kelley Williams
published
3.45
Erica Curtiss
published
3.45
Sheri Faulkenberg
published
3.43
Richard Curtiss
published
3.42
Leah Gehring
published
3.28
Damian Rosales
published 3.5
3.28
Anand Bala
published 3.5
3.25
Kate Li
published
3.24
Gautam Petkar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Curtiss + Richard Curtiss51047% games+16.1% vs expected
Richard Curtiss + Laura Grable8557% games+15.3% vs expected
Laura Grable + JASON RICHMOND14362% games+7.0% vs expected
Cliff Dickinson + Laura Grable7552% games+5.3% vs expected
Erica Curtiss + JASON RICHMOND5256% gamesnot enough data
Richard Curtiss + Kelley Williams3355% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Williams + Gautam Petkar4163% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Faulkenberg + JASON RICHMOND134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Grable
201W–113L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Cliff Dickinson
64W–36L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
JASON RICHMOND
105W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Jill Davidson
75W–66L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Kelley Williams
122W–68L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Erica Curtiss
192W–146L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sheri Faulkenberg
102W–93L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Richard Curtiss
143W–91L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Leah Gehring
65W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Damian Rosales
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anand Bala
65W–30L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Kate Li
91W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Gautam Petkar
21W–12L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.