Teams

GSTL18/Hills/Wachesaw

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - GSTL · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Haselden / Megan Haselden vs Meredith Lukowski / James Bergen1-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Plemmons / Ryan Plemmons vs Alexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Haselden / Megan Haselden vs Lorraine Pepe / James Bergen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-15vs GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeghan Williams / Seth Williams vs Alexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeanne Hobert / Matt Hobert vs Lorraine Pepe / James Bergen0-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeanne Hobert / Matt Hobert vs Alexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Williams / Seth Williams vs James Bergen / Kenza Miller2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-18vs GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunesWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Plemmons / Ryan Plemmons vs Gabriela Leggett / Jonathan Leggett6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Haselden / Matthew Haselden vs Jenifer Armeen / James Bergen6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Tiffany Plemmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Megan Haselden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Meghan Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Hilary Hills
published
Leanne Hobert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Hobert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Haselden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Plemmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Seth Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Haselden + Matthew Haselden3441% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Plemmons + Ryan Plemmons134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Plemmons
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
Megan Haselden
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Meghan Williams
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Hilary Hills
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Hobert
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Hobert
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Haselden
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Plemmons
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Seth Williams
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.