Teams

GSTL18/Warren/GrandeDunes

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - GSTL · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs GSTL18/Hills/WachesawWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Lukowski / James Bergen vs Matthew Haselden / Megan Haselden6-1, 6-1
2025-06-22vs GSTL18/Hills/WachesawWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez vs Tiffany Plemmons / Ryan Plemmons4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Pepe / James Bergen vs Matthew Haselden / Megan Haselden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-15vs GSTL18/Hills/WachesawWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez vs Meghan Williams / Seth Williams6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Pepe / James Bergen vs Leanne Hobert / Matt Hobert6-0, 6-1
2025-06-01vs GSTL18/Hills/WachesawWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexandria Ramirez / Carlos Ramirez vs Leanne Hobert / Matt Hobert6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJames Bergen / Kenza Miller vs Meghan Williams / Seth Williams6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-18vs GSTL18/Hills/WachesawLost 02
L#1 DoublesGabriela Leggett / Jonathan Leggett vs Tiffany Plemmons / Ryan Plemmons0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenifer Armeen / James Bergen vs Megan Haselden / Matthew Haselden3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Gabriela Leggett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Alexandria Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Lorraine Pepe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.32
Stephanie Warren
published
2.24
Kenza Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.10
Meredith Lukowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Jenifer Armeen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Bergen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jonathan Leggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriela Leggett
26W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Alexandria Ramirez
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Lorraine Pepe
21W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Stephanie Warren
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Kenza Miller
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Meredith Lukowski
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jenifer Armeen
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
James Bergen
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Leggett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.