Teams

CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Myers

Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Women, F

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-30vs CIN A40 3.0W IHP ValentineWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Schmahl / Kyle Fisher vs Cole Healy / Courtney Hatch6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnna Ristow vs Katie Geik7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacia O'Donnell / Sharae Arnold vs Ashley Welch / Maureen Saul6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-23vs CIN A40 3.0W WIRC BourquinWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Rasmussen / Kari Huddleston vs Christina Graham / Sarah Clem6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnna Ristow vs Kristi Shea2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Laird / Jo-Ann Feltman vs Katherine Butler / Theresa Mayer6-3, 6-1
2025-10-16vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD RyanWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Seybert / Anna Ristow vs Keenan Copeland / Melissa Patterson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Whitsett vs Katherine Goth6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Terry / Julie Myers vs Kate Fisch / Cheongae Welch1-6, 3-6
2025-10-09vs CIN A40 3.0W IND SensemanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Schumacher / Sharae Arnold vs Andrea Hoffman / Neha Gavin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Fisher / Donna Schmahl vs Natalie Scheidler / Shannon Swindell6-1, 6-3
2025-10-02vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD HoldenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Ristow / Becky Seybert vs Michelle Trotter / Laura Combs6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Myers / Kari Huddleston vs Laura Sniadecki / Elizabeth Smart1-6, 1-6
2025-09-25vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD TaylorWon 21
L#1 DoublesCathy Rasmussen / Thuy Nguyen vs Gwendolen Morris / Karen Christensen6-7, 3-5
W#1 SinglesBeth Whitsett vs MaryCatharine Grau6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Terry / Stacia O'Donnell vs Carolyn Kinsey / Cara Roellgen6-1, 6-3
2025-09-18vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD BellamyWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Schumacher / Kyle Fisher vs Kym Steager / Lily Pai4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Grass vs Beth Cottingham7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSharae Arnold / Karen Roberts vs Haley Lawrence / Savi Danforth6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Women, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Holden70201489
2CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Myers6114717170
3CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Bellamy43111021179
4CIN A40 3.0W IND Senseman43101125193
5CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Ryan3412921183
6CIN A40 3.0W IHP Valentine3481327186
7CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin1651633209
8CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Taylor0741735230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Becky Seybert
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.01
Carrie Grass
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Beth Whitsett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Anna Ristow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Donna Laird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Kari Huddleston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Donna Schmahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Sharae Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Stacia O'Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Cathy Rasmussen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Lori Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Angie Terry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Melanie Wagner
published
2.46
Jo-Ann Feltman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Seybert + Beth Whitsett8066% games+15.1% vs expected
Cathy Rasmussen + Beth Whitsett9258% games+8.3% vs expected
Becky Seybert + Lori Schumacher7455% games−1.4% vs expected
Becky Seybert + Kari Huddleston6270% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Rasmussen + Kyle Fisher2444% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Rasmussen + Lori Schumacher1550% gamesnot enough data
Stacia O'Donnell + Kyle Fisher5167% gamesnot enough data
Becky Seybert + Anna Ristow4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Seybert
163W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Carrie Grass
35W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Beth Whitsett
138W–79L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Anna Ristow
79W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Donna Laird
40W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kari Huddleston
113W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Donna Schmahl
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Sharae Arnold
73W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Stacia O'Donnell
73W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Cathy Rasmussen
77W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Lori Schumacher
132W–110L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Angie Terry
28W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Melanie Wagner
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Jo-Ann Feltman
19W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kyle Fisher
84W–105L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.