Teams

CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Holden

Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Women, F

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-30vs CIN A40 3.0W WIRC BourquinWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Trotter / Kelley Holden vs Christina Graham / Pamela Bennett6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Combs vs Kelli-gladys Tharpe6-1, 6-0
2025-10-23vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD RyanWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Arnold / Michelle Fee vs Misty Brown / Keenan Copeland7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Combs vs Meghan Stallings6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Owens / Lisa Kempsell vs Julie May / Lan Nguyen5-7, 4-6
2025-10-16vs CIN A40 3.0W IND SensemanWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeidi Arnold / Kathy Collins vs Andrea Hoffman / Shannon Swindell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Kempsell / Courtney McKinney vs Cindy Senseman / Christina Klenke6-1, 6-3
2025-10-09vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD TaylorWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelley Holden / Laura Sniadecki vs Karen Christensen / Annette Moore6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarla Crouse vs MaryCatharine Grau6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney McKinney / Denise Katz vs Lisa Roever / Jo Fowler6-0, 6-0
2025-10-02vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD MyersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Trotter / Laura Combs vs Anna Ristow / Becky Seybert7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarla Crouse vs Karen Roberts6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Sniadecki / Elizabeth Smart vs Julie Myers / Kari Huddleston6-1, 6-1
2025-09-25vs CIN A40 3.0W IRCD BellamyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Arnold / Michelle Trotter vs Lori Minyard / Lily Pai6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaura Combs vs Estacia Brandenburg7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Fee / Elizabeth Smart vs Kym Steager / Haley Lawrence6-1, 6-3
2025-09-18vs CIN A40 3.0W IHP ValentineWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Combs / Laura Sniadecki vs Rachele Fraker / Courtney Hatch6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelley Holden / Carla Crouse vs Andrea Turner / Ashley Welch6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Women, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Holden70201489
2CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Myers6114717170
3CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Bellamy43111021179
4CIN A40 3.0W IND Senseman43101125193
5CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Ryan3412921183
6CIN A40 3.0W IHP Valentine3481327186
7CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin1651633209
8CIN A40 3.0W IRCD Taylor0741735230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Carla Crouse
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Laura Combs
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Michelle Fee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Laura Sniadecki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Heidi Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Denise Katz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Michelle Trotter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Elizabeth Smart
published 3
2.73
Kelley Holden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Lisa Kempsell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Collins
published
Kelly Owens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Trotter + Kelly Owens7260% games+18.4% vs expected
Laura Combs + Michelle Trotter17561% games+13.5% vs expected
Carla Crouse + Laura Combs8164% games+8.3% vs expected
Kelley Holden + Kathy Collins8261% games+4.6% vs expected
Kathy Collins + Michelle Trotter7950% games+0.0% vs expected
Kelley Holden + Lisa Kempsell4645% games−7.8% vs expected
Laura Sniadecki + Michelle Trotter5351% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Holden + Michelle Trotter5259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carla Crouse
116W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Laura Combs
165W–75L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.34
Michelle Fee
35W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.11
Laura Sniadecki
41W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Heidi Arnold
69W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Denise Katz
35W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Michelle Trotter
104W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Courtney McKinney
16W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Smart
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelley Holden
83W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Kempsell
53W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kathy Collins
74W–54L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Owens
30W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.