Teams

PIPER PK 18AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.69
Nadine Johnson
published
3.62
Hanae Stansvik
published
3.60
Lara McDermott
published
3.55
Lucia Wallace
published
3.55
Shannon Rajewski
published
3.50
Meghan Caldwell
published
3.45
Christine Neumeier
published 3.5
3.42
Colleen Sonneborn
published 3.5
3.29
Priya Shete
published
Catherine Hale
published 3.5
3.17
Neeta Thakur
published
3.13
Nina Kim
published
3.10
Cristina Moreno
published 3.5
Marni Phippen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Sonneborn + Nina Kim7356% games+9.6% vs expected
Priya Shete + Neeta Thakur3644% games−8.9% vs expected
Hanae Stansvik + Shannon Rajewski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Nadine Johnson
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Hanae Stansvik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Lara McDermott
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Lucia Wallace
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Shannon Rajewski
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Meghan Caldwell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Christine Neumeier
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Colleen Sonneborn
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Priya Shete
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Hale
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Neeta Thakur
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Nina Kim
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cristina Moreno
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Marni Phippen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.