Teams

Broussard/18/3.0/WN/BEVR

2025 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 2.92 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-10vs Caletri/18/3.0/WN/REDSWon 32
L#1 DoublesArlene Dupuis / Arlene Manikandan vs Sarah Darouse / Cristen Chadwick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAngelle Hollier vs Adriana Mijares6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Broussard / Kellie Hoss vs Michelle Privat / Kiley Caletri6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKathy Broussard vs Emily Breaux6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Emfinger / Annie Ducote vs Jenna Hardy / Chloe Reese5-7, 1-6
2025-02-06vs Silsby/18/3.0/WN/YSCLost 14
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Broussard / Kellie Hoss vs Sarah Clark / Kim White2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAngelle Hollier vs Paige Stinson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAimee ONiell / Marguerita Archangel vs Elizabeth Landry / Jodi Venable1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKathy Broussard vs Kylie Migues4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnnie Ducote / Nancy Eleanor vs Parmida Showalter / Mollie McAlister2-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs Johnson/18/3.0/WN/BEVRLost 23
L#1 DoublesArlene Manikandan / Katherine Campora vs Jessica Foreman / Timi Wadleigh4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngelle Hollier vs Valerie Guidry6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Broussard / Marilyn Emfinger vs Jamie Duval / Brenda Venable6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKellie Hoss vs JACLYN BRIDGES BACON3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAimee ONiell / Teresa LeBlanc vs Andrea Johnson / Alexis DeJean3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-27vs Cormier/18/WN/BEVRWon 41
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Broussard / Kellie Hoss vs Sandra Cormier / Jill Dirk6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAngelle Hollier vs Nathalia Flores Rivette6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArlene Dupuis / Aimee ONiell vs Elizabeth Miller / Lisa Bell5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathy Broussard vs Logan Dupre7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Eleanor / Annie Ducote vs Sheryl Russo / RACHEL HUVAL4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LeBlanc/18/3.0/WN/BSC9043210204
2Silsby/18/3.0/WN/YSC81321327268
3McCullough/18/3.0/WN/YSC63232248362
4Daigle/18/3.0/WN/REDS54252047356
5Longman/18/3.0/WN/OCC54242151403
6Cormier/18/WN/BEVR54192657444
7Broussard/18/3.0/WN/BEVR36172860427
8Melancon/18/3.0/WN/BEVR27192655404
9Johnson/18/3.0/WN/BEVR27123369465
10Caletri/18/3.0/WN/REDS09113472469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Angelle Hollier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Carolyn Broussard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Aimee ONiell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Kathy Broussard
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Kellie Hoss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.59
Arlene Dupuis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Arlene Manikandan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Teresa LeBlanc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Marilyn Emfinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Annie Ducote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Marcela Carmichael
published
Katherine Campora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marguerita Archangel
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Nancy Eleanor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Broussard + Kellie Hoss3445% games−1.2% vs expected
Carolyn Broussard + Teresa LeBlanc134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Broussard + Angelle Hollier033 matchesnot enough data
Angelle Hollier + Kellie Hoss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angelle Hollier
41W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Carolyn Broussard
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Aimee ONiell
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Broussard
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Kellie Hoss
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Arlene Dupuis
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Arlene Manikandan
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Teresa LeBlanc
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Marilyn Emfinger
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Annie Ducote
2W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Marcela Carmichael
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.27
Katherine Campora
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marguerita Archangel
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Eleanor
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.