Teams

CHATA/Kathryn Willis

2026 CHATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall '25 · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-25vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulia Petry / Tracey Stribling vs Lesa Cleaveland / Sheri Bland6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Arrington / Susan Rollings vs Mary Child / Lisa Morman1-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Patton / Natalie Doerr vs Sheri Bland / Patricia Graben6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSuzie Cook / Leslie Battle vs Lesa Cleaveland / Sally Clay Smith4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-14vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Minicozzi / Jeaneen Thompson vs Lesa Cleaveland / Sheri Bland6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Willis / Melinda Pomeroy-Black vs Luann Jones / Janice Ward6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandLost 02
L#1 DoublesTricia Hammond / Kami Adams vs Sheri Bland / Patricia Graben7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzie Cook / Cathy Arrington vs Lesa Cleaveland / Sally Clay Smith3-6, 3-6
2025-09-30vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandLost 12
W#1 DoublesTricia Hammond / Natalie Doerr vs Luann Jones / Sally Clay Smith6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Battle / Kami Adams vs Lesa Cleaveland / Lisa Morman2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Rollings / Melinda Pomeroy-Black vs Janice Ward / Mary Child0-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Minicozzi / Carla Hale vs Anita Holle / Debbie Jones6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeanne Green / Natalie Doerr vs Janice Ward / Mary Child6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Rollings / Ashley Kersey vs Lesa Cleaveland / Sheri Bland7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-14vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Patton / Tricia Hammond vs Patricia Graben / Lesa Cleaveland6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Kemp / Kathryn Willis vs Sheri Bland / Debbie Jones6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeanne Green / Susan Rollings vs Janice Ward / Mary Child7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-13vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Kemp / Natalie Doerr vs Janice Ward / Mary Child6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeaneen Thompson / Jeanne Green vs Vickie Teall / Sheri Bland6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Willis / Leslie Battle vs Sally Clay Smith / Denise Robinson6-3, 6-3
2025-09-09vs Chata/Lesa CleavelandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Kemp / Julie Patton vs Anita Holle / Mary Child6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarla Hale / Natalie Doerr vs Lesa Cleaveland / Luann Jones4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHATA/Kathryn Willis7218923203
2Chata/Lesa Cleaveland2791840275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jeanne Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Jill Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Tricia Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Julia Petry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Julie Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Natalie Doerr
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Melinda Pomeroy-Black
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Suzie Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Carla Hale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Ashley Kersey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Tracey Stribling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Susan Rollings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Leslie Battle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Christine Minicozzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Kami Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Jeaneen Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Cathy Arrington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Doerr + Suzie Cook4259% gamesnot enough data
Susan Rollings + Cathy Arrington5164% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Kersey + Susan Rollings4157% gamesnot enough data
Jeaneen Thompson + Tracey Stribling224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Rollings + Kami Adams404 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Cook + Leslie Battle404 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Cook + Jill Kemp404 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Pomeroy-Black + Leslie Battle134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanne Green
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Jill Kemp
28W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Tricia Hammond
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Julia Petry
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Julie Patton
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Natalie Doerr
24W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Melinda Pomeroy-Black
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Suzie Cook
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Carla Hale
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Ashley Kersey
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Tracey Stribling
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Susan Rollings
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Leslie Battle
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christine Minicozzi
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kami Adams
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Jeaneen Thompson
30W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cathy Arrington
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.