Teams

TYCC Friday Funday - C. Saylor

2025 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.28 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-04vs HCC Summer Sizzlers - B. CastroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaryn Bersch / Courtney Johnson vs Liz Newman / Katherine Cowley1-4
W#2 DoublesCourtney Steiner / Lindsay Davitt vs Emelia Flitman / Kelly Machonis6-4, 6-1
2025-08-29vs Hunters Green - L. MarinezWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Barrow / Karyn Bersch vs Lisa Marinez / Danna Sturman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Courtney Steiner vs Megan Brooks / Jan Sayad6-1, 6-2
2025-08-08vs Plant City TriLevel - P. SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColey Simmons / Erica Brandon vs Rachel Ray / Monica Trujillo3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulianne Frost / Lindsay Davitt vs Patricia Smith / Melissa Foster6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Maggie Packer vs Maria Karina Espinoza / Jayme Kosar6-0, 6-2
2025-07-25vs Buckhorn Babes - D. LinthicumWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Digiacomo / Emily Baldwin vs Christina Sullivan / Renee Rasmussen7-5, 6-1
2025-07-18vs River Hills - J. OLearyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Lang / Coley Simmons vs Sarah Ayres / Wendy Liller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulianne Frost / Jessica Digiacomo vs Nathalie Crane / Karen Wingard5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Casey Saylor
published 3.5
3.24
Karyn Bersch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Coley Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Heather Barrow
published
3.17
Courtney Steiner
published 3.5
3.13
Erica Brandon
published
3.08
Courtney Lang
published 3.5
3.05
Maggie Packer
published
3.00
Julianne Frost
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Emily Baldwin
published
2.97
Lindsay Davitt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.92
Jessica Digiacomo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Kristine Harb
published
2.59
Caroline Doyle
published 3
2.38
Susanna Bray
published
2.33
Sarah Boe
published
Jennifer Berk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Doyle + Kristine Harb5083% games+25.3% vs expected
Coley Simmons + Emily Baldwin3256% games+15.8% vs expected
Coley Simmons + Karyn Bersch24362% games+9.4% vs expected
Julianne Frost + Jessica Digiacomo111155% games−0.8% vs expected
Lindsay Davitt + Julianne Frost5349% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Davitt + Karyn Bersch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Saylor
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Karyn Bersch
93W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Coley Simmons
64W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Heather Barrow
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Courtney Steiner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Erica Brandon
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Courtney Lang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Maggie Packer
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Julianne Frost
83W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Emily Baldwin
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Lindsay Davitt
87W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Jessica Digiacomo
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Kristine Harb
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
3
Caroline Doyle
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Susanna Bray
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.38
Sarah Boe
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Jennifer Berk
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.