Teams

Fireballs Tri-level Buckhorn - C. Guido

2025 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-05vs Buckhorn Babes - D. LinthicumWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Krissy Heybroek vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott6-2, 6-4
2025-08-15vs River Hills - J. OLearyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Cunningham / Sheryl Schumacher vs Ann Dunleavy / Merbaliz Ferris6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Nicole Kipp vs Catalina Biolcati / Ashley Rhattigan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-01vs TYCC Friday Funday - C. SaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheryl Schumacher / Krissy Heybroek vs Casey Saylor / Courtney Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-18vs HCC Summer Sizzlers - B. CastroWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Cunningham / Krissy Heybroek vs Melissa Wolfe / Lorrie White6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Hohman / Pam Smith vs Marisol Cohen / Barbara Castro6-2, 7-5
2025-07-11vs Apollo Beach - M. FlynnWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Sheryl Schumacher vs Mary Flynn / Michelle Butler6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTammy Hohman / Pam Smith vs Amalia Alaniz / Rachel Sultenfuss6-3, 6-4
2025-06-27vs Plant City TriLevel - P. SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Carol Guido vs Rachel Ray / Monica Trujillo7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Hohman / Anita Riley vs Patricia Smith / Angie Mudge6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Krissy Heybroek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Nicole Kipp
published
3.19
Tammy Hohman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Carol Guido
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Sheryl Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pam Smith
published
2.99
Danielle Cunningham
published 3.5
Anita Riley
published 3
2.73
2.55
Shannon Tompkins
published
2.46
Jayme Kosar
published
2.25
Sonia Isacchi
published
2.25
Danielle Vila
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Kipp + Krissy Heybroek4167% games+10.3% vs expected
Krissy Heybroek + Sheryl Schumacher16954% games−1.0% vs expected
Pam Smith + Tammy Hohman8749% games−1.8% vs expected
Tammy Hohman + Carol Guido3654% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Carol Guido4347% gamesnot enough data
Krissy Heybroek + Carol Guido314 matchesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Danielle Cunningham134 matchesnot enough data
Pam Smith + Carol Guido123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Krissy Heybroek
212W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Nicole Kipp
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Tammy Hohman
77W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–215L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Sheryl Schumacher
112W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Pam Smith
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Danielle Cunningham
9W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Anita Riley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Karina Espinoza
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Shannon Tompkins
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Jayme Kosar
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Sonia Isacchi
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Danielle Vila
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.