Teams

Three Chimneys Farm (Jonathan Ambery)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 3.0 Men (D.C.)

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-24vs Fields Club (Kevin Brown)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesChad Brady / Brian Malia vs Greg White / Chandler White3-6, 6-3, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Ambery vs Patrick Wogsland5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Musselwhite / Brian Nickell vs David Zhou / Martin Levinson6-2, 3-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJay Smolej vs HanSoo Kim6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMike Mclaughlin / Tom Gray vs Will Benham / Kevin Brown6-2, 4-6, 6-4
2026-01-21vs Cambridge (Ken Rankin)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesChad Brady / Mark Musselwhite vs Ryan McGuire / Brian Pendergrass6-7, 7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGeorge Gutenberg vs Aleksei Solovev5-7, 7-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Rouse / Tom Gray vs Ira Feingold / Ken Rankin4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStan Hoover vs Jacob Hairston4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJay Smolej / Mike Mclaughlin vs Joseph Englert / Scott Reynolds1-6, 4-6
2026-01-10vs CC of Roswell (Alan Balch)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesChad Brady / Brian Malia vs Sam Unger / William Henderson6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGeorge Gutenberg vs Paul Van Eybergen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Musselwhite / Blake Rouse vs Michael Krauter / Alan Balch7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJonathan Ambery vs Jack Priblo6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStan Hoover / Tom Gray vs Robert Biagioni / Jay Rodriguez6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesChad Brady / George Gutenberg vs John Banks / Matthew Omerza5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStan Hoover vs Richard Jo4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Gray / Brian Malia vs Gregory Lovell / Gabriel Lovell1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDennis Burke vs Luke Stephan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Ambery / Blake Rouse vs Tim Davis / Brandon Dunn0-6, 6-7
2025-11-24vs Windward (Steven Stewart)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesChad Brady / Glenn Maust vs Michael Hartman / Glenn Carter2-6, 6-4, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGeorge Gutenberg vs Don Zahnle3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJonathan Ambery / Sean Oconnor vs Andrew Sandoe / Krishnan Sampath2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDennis Burke vs Jonathan Wright0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDuane Flynn / Tom Gray vs Ling Zhou / Thomas Graef3-6, 6-4, 2-6
2025-11-15vs Wild Timber (Brian McCorvey)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesMark Musselwhite / Brian Malia vs Ovidiu Nicoara / Matthew Brotherton0-6, 6-4, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGeorge Gutenberg vs Ben Owen6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Rouse / Stan Hoover vs David Wick / Rob Collins1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDennis Burke vs Bo Hofmann7-6, 2-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDuane Flynn / Mike Mclaughlin vs Steven McQueen / Jeremy Hooie6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (D.C.) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Brian Nickell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Brian Malia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
George Gutenberg
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Dennis Burke
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Duane Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Jonathan Ambery
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Mark Musselwhite
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Tom Gray
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.57
Chad Brady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Mike Mclaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Stan Hoover
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Jay Smolej
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Blake Rouse
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.16
Glenn Maust
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sean Oconnor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Musselwhite + Chad Brady224 matchesnot enough data
Duane Flynn + Mike Mclaughlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Nickell
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Brian Malia
2W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
George Gutenberg
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dennis Burke
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Duane Flynn
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Jonathan Ambery
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Mark Musselwhite
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Tom Gray
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Chad Brady
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Mike Mclaughlin
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Stan Hoover
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jay Smolej
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Blake Rouse
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Glenn Maust
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Sean Oconnor
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.