Teams

Windward (Steven Stewart)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 3.0 Men (D.C.)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-28vs Polo Golf & CC (Jason Craven)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Hartman / Krishnan Sampath vs Michael Wear / Jason McFadden2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJim Piscano vs Bradley Carter4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Conk / Ling Zhou vs Luke Bradshaw / Timothy Mullen4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesThomas Graef / Andrew Sandoe vs Brian Pierce / Jason King6-2, 7-6
2026-01-23vs Wild Timber (Brian McCorvey)*Split 22
L#1 DoublesCory Anderson / Peter Follett vs Brian McCorvey / Rob Collins6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJim Piscano vs Alex Ikim5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLing Zhou / Steven Stewart vs Bo Hofmann / Ovidiu Nicoara6-3, 2-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRob Hanson / Richard Conk vs David Wick / Dan Nackers6-2, 6-3
2026-01-14vs Fields Club (Kevin Brown)*Won 40
W#1 DoublesAndrew Sandoe / Cory Anderson vs HanSoo Kim / Carson White6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJim Piscano vs Chandler White7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPeter Follett / Richard Conk vs Melvin Bullock / Ben Lester7-5, 4-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSteven Stewart / Krishnan Sampath vs Will Benham / Jason Getz6-2, 6-1
2025-12-13vs Cambridge (Ken Rankin)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesCory Anderson / Peter Follett vs Eric Shack / Brian Pendergrass5-7, 6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Wright vs Aleksei Solovev4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRob Hanson / Ling Zhou vs Jacob Hairston / Ira Feingold6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Conk / Andrew Sandoe vs Murali Sundaramurthy / Rick Matarrese6-0, 6-1
2025-12-06vs CC of Roswell (Alan Balch)*Won 40
W#1 DoublesPeter Follett / Cory Anderson vs Rusty Matzick / Mark Sutherland6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJonathan Wright vs Byron Floyd6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRichard Conk / Krishnan Sampath vs Alan Balch / Sam Unger7-6, 2-6, 1-2
W#3 DoublesRob Hanson / Thomas Graef vs Robert Biagioni / Joe Crews6-0, 7-5
W#1 DoublesMichael Hartman / Glenn Carter vs Chad Brady / Glenn Maust6-2, 4-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDon Zahnle vs George Gutenberg6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Sandoe / Krishnan Sampath vs Jonathan Ambery / Sean Oconnor6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJonathan Wright vs Dennis Burke6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLing Zhou / Thomas Graef vs Duane Flynn / Tom Gray6-3, 4-6, 6-2
L#1 DoublesGlenn Carter / Peter Follett vs Gregory Lovell / Abraham Wang2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJim Piscano vs Richard Jo6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Conk / Krishnan Sampath vs Matthew Omerza / Matt Summerville3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Sandoe vs Luke Stephan4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Graef / Rob Hanson vs Brandon Dunn / Tim Davis5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (D.C.) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Don Zahnle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Andrew Sandoe
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Cory Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Rob Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Jonathan Wright
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.84
Glenn Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Ling Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Jim Piscano
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Krishnan Sampath
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Thomas Graef
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Richard Conk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Steven Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Hartman
published
Peter Follett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krishnan Sampath + Richard Conk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Don Zahnle
17W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Andrew Sandoe
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Cory Anderson
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Rob Hanson
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Jonathan Wright
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Glenn Carter
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Ling Zhou
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Jim Piscano
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Krishnan Sampath
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Thomas Graef
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Richard Conk
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Steven Stewart
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Michael Hartman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Follett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.