Teams

TOC.Sayko

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-20vs TOC.HanauerLost 01
L#1 SinglesJonathan Canon vs Daniel Gallo6-7, 6-7
2024-08-19vs HSHS.ByrdLost 02
L#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Brett Eckles3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Mike Trefzger3-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs HSHS.ByrdSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Brett Eckles3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJonathan Canon vs Herman Gudjonson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs HSHS.ByrdWon 10
W#3 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Ali Moradmand6-1, 6-1
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Patrick Grant6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-15vs TOC.FowlerLost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Wes Watson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-08vs TOC.HanauerLost 01
L#1 SinglesJonathan Canon vs Spencer Llewellyn1-6, 4-6
2024-06-10vs TOC.HanauerWon 20
W#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Eric Sandifer6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Kelvin Menezes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-03vs TOC.FowlerLost 01
L#3 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Eric Chima3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Zack Czajkowski
published
4.29
Jonathan Canon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Stewart Bible
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Sayko + Jonathan Canon134 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Sayko + Stewart Bible134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Jonathan Canon
102W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.