Teams

HSHS.Byrd

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-20vs TOC.HanauerWon 20
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Spencer Llewellyn6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Abhi Bhirud6-4, 6-4
2024-08-20vs TOC.FowlerLost 01
L#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Eric Chima4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-19vs TOC.SaykoWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Ryan Sayko6-3, 6-0
2024-08-18vs TOC.SaykoSplit 11
W#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Anil Chawla6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Jonathan Canon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-15vs TOC.FowlerWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Artur Wilk6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Justin Fowler7-5, 6-2
2024-08-12vs TOC.SaykoWon 10
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Zack Czajkowski7-6, 6-3
2024-08-05vs TOC.HanauerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Abhi Bhirud7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Eric Sandifer4-6, 4-6
2024-07-21vs TOC.HanauerWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Juan Andrade6-1, 6-1
2024-06-10vs TOC.FowlerWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs James Treires7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Herman Gudjonson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4.5
4.35
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
4.32
Andrew Lopez
published 4.5
4.29
Mike Trefzger
published
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
published 4.5
3.96
Ali Moradmand
published 4
3.93
Craig Radley
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Herman Gudjonson6262% games+2.4% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Herman Gudjonson161257% games−5.0% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Herman Gudjonson
115W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Alex Renfrow
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Andrew Lopez
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
Mike Trefzger
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Ali Moradmand
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Craig Radley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.