Teams

AWiethoff (Springfield)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-09vs KFerry/KCrosby (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesVolree Wade vs Katie Ferry2-6, 0-6
2022-04-04vs SLee/GBuck (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVolree Wade / Bailey Zobel vs Casey Beck / Jamie Dorsey5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-01vs AMoore (Charlotte Country Club)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesVolree Wade vs Anna Glass2-6, 2-6
2022-03-28vs EConklin/Aliota (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesVolree Wade / Barbara Moysaenko vs Sandra Gaffner / SUSAN ALIOTA6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-21vs AIannuzzi (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Volree Wade vs Julie Johnson / Maria Sevigny7-5, 6-4
2022-03-07vs NBrasch (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVolree Wade / Bailey Zobel vs Laura Richards / Elizabeth Suppa2-6, 6-7
2022-02-28vs KCox (MPCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVolree Wade / Karen Garland vs Rebecca Drendel / Patti Glassner2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.47
Kathryn Collins
published
Amy Wiethoff
published 3.5
3.06
Volree Wade
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.80
Kara Ward
published
2.79
Traci Prieto
published
2.62
2.61
Bailey Zobel
published 3
2.56
Karin Flemming
published
2.54
Lindsay Curby
published
2.52
Karen Garland
published
Patti Bachner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Wiethoff + Barbara Moysaenko4452% games+4.8% vs expected
Volree Wade + Kara Ward6550% games−1.1% vs expected
Traci Prieto + Volree Wade1640% games−3.4% vs expected
Volree Wade + Patti Bachner4448% games−5.2% vs expected
Traci Prieto + Kathryn Collins4258% gamesnot enough data
Volree Wade + Bailey Zobel2357% gamesnot enough data
Karin Flemming + Bailey Zobel2351% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Collins + Barbara Moysaenko314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Moysaenko
85W–84L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Kathryn Collins
42W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Amy Wiethoff
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Volree Wade
125W–172L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kara Ward
38W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
Traci Prieto
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Heather Backeberg
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Bailey Zobel
23W–28L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Karin Flemming
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Lindsay Curby
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Karen Garland
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Patti Bachner
15W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.