Teams

COLLIER - Naples Grande - Larkin

2022 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Healy / Debra Logue vs Deborah Miller / Susan Wandler6-2, 6-4
2022-02-23vs Pelican Landing - D BellWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Mary Lou Roush vs Deborah Washburn / Dale Schneider4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren McGuire / Marilynn Stuart vs Ellen Davis / Marlene Tatham6-3, 6-1
2022-02-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Teresa Benjamin vs Cindy Benike / Hannelore Fischer6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Larkin / Debra Logue vs Shirley Scholl / Ann Smith6-0, 6-1
2022-02-09vs Naples Grande - B. BurkeWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Manning / Karen McGuire vs Peggy Reynolds / Colleen Burns Keenan7-6, 6-3
2022-02-02vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Healy / Debra Logue vs Ricki Levine / Ellen Schmidt6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCandia Barry / Mary Lou Roush vs Michele Megas-Ditomassi / Nancy Ferguson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-19vs Naples Grande - N. BlackWon 21
L#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Meg Perez vs Lynn Norris / Susan Sliker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Logue / Kathy Healy vs Laura Baetz / Angela Whinyates6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynne Lee Becker / Karen McGuire vs Linda Koole / Mary Ann Benzing6-3, 6-1
2022-01-05vs Vineyards - BowenkampLost 01
L#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Mary Lou Roush vs Cari Shaw / Sindi Sanzica7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Candia Barry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Ann Manning
published 4
Jackie Sawicki
published 4
3.62
Meg Perez
published
3.44
Teresa Benjamin
published
Karen McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McGuire + Candia Barry5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candia Barry
145W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ann Manning
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Sawicki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meg Perez
90W–92L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Teresa Benjamin
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Karen McGuire
68W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Ford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.