Teams

WC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs HW YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Burton / Rebecca Boxer vs Tiffany Steinmetz / JULIE HANCOCK7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLara Long / Paula Schmitt vs Krislyn Sayre / Holly Shrewsbury5-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Escalante / Christine Mosch vs Barbara Superka / Annie Basham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-29vs HV SILVERLost 23
L#1 DoublesTina Burton / Lara Long vs Jean Mortellaro / Elena Ellcessor2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer David vs Margo Ellis6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Mosch / Erin Herman vs Monica Reidelbach / Leslie Moody2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Boxer vs Carrie Romine6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaula Schmitt / Lisa Escalante vs Laurie Korff / Charlotte Brady7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-26vs SSH GREYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Boxer / Jennifer David vs Pamela Coe / Mary Clare Hainsworth5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTina Burton vs Jacalyn Peter3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Schmitt vs Mary Bakken6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Herman / Lara Long vs Sheila Baker / Anne-Marie Hukriede6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-24vs LTFC GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesPaula Schmitt / Kirsten Mau vs Erin Clark / Audrey Moskowitz2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Boxer vs Jennifer Ramsey2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTina Burton / Erin Herman vs Beth Florin / Gaytral Ackerman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLara Long / Lisa Escalante vs Tiffany Cholez / Emily Main Ballard4-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs HG BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesKirsten Mau / Christine Mosch vs Marla Terwilliger / Debbie Lepetsos0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer David vs Elise Luter6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatherine Hurley / Erin Herman vs Charity Aslin / Suzette Loving4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesTina Burton vs Lisa Morrisroe6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLara Long / Paula Schmitt vs Joan Eckrich / Jennifer Gruidel3-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs SSH YELLOWWon 32
L#1 DoublesKirsten Mau / Paula Schmitt vs Crystal Clark / Shamiree Dillman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Boxer vs Susan Canetto7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLara Long / Tina Burton vs Jennifer Lobb / Cheryl Jones7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer David vs Lois Streckenbein6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Escalante / Erin Herman vs Jaime Martinez / Kathi Engelken1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-03vs GAC PURPLELost 05
L#1 DoublesTina Burton / Christine Mosch vs Patsy Botts / Katherine Flahive3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer David vs Dawn Wolf1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Boxer / Erin Herman vs Jonna Mulqueen / Laura Routh6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLara Long vs Wendy Liu2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Mau / Lisa Escalante vs Rhonda Buder / Kay Christensen1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Tina Burton
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.92
Rebecca Boxer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Jennifer David
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Kirsten Mau
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katherine Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Erin Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christine Mosch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lara Long
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Paula Schmitt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Burton + Rebecca Boxer4165% games+12.3% vs expected
Kirsten Mau + Jennifer David13163% games+9.5% vs expected
Kirsten Mau + Tina Burton18462% games+4.6% vs expected
Jennifer David + Tina Burton4256% games+2.3% vs expected
Tina Burton + Christine Mosch0536% gamesnot enough data
Tina Burton + Erin Herman134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Mosch + Erin Herman044 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Mau + Paula Schmitt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Burton
98W–61L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
Rebecca Boxer
28W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jennifer David
63W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Kirsten Mau
89W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
Katherine Hurley
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Erin Herman
18W–33L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Christine Mosch
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lara Long
8W–13L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Schmitt
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.