Teams

GAC PURPLE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-31vs HG BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesDawn Wolf / Patsy Botts vs Debbie Lepetsos / Jennifer Gruidel3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Suzette Loving6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Buder / Tracy Sickels vs Elise Luter / Lisa Morrisroe6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKay Christensen / Lorie Whalen vs Shelley Reed / Marla Terwilliger3-6, 4-6
2021-05-28vs SSH GREYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatherine Flahive / Dawn Wolf vs Mary Clare Hainsworth / Pamela Coe6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Jacalyn Peter0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Routh / Tracy Sickels vs Jane Tupler / Janice Lastrella3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKay Christensen / Lorie Whalen vs Mary Bakken / Jennie Hewitt4-6, 3-6
2021-05-24vs HW YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesDawn Wolf / Katherine Flahive vs Lauren Francis / Tiffany Steinmetz6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Julie Kavas6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTracy Sickels / Kay Christensen vs Holly Georgelos / Krislyn Sayre3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRhonda Buder / Lorie Whalen vs Barbara Superka / Brenda Mahedy6-3, 6-2
2021-05-17vs LTFC GOLDWon 40
W#1 DoublesPatsy Botts / Tracy Sickels vs Renee Stemberger / Tara Kill1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Jennifer Ramsey6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Laura Routh vs Erin Clark / Beth Florin7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRhonda Buder / Kay Christensen vs Debbie Murphy / Carol Wood6-3, 6-4
2021-05-03vs WC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesPatsy Botts / Katherine Flahive vs Tina Burton / Christine Mosch6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDawn Wolf vs Jennifer David6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Laura Routh vs Rebecca Boxer / Erin Herman4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRhonda Buder / Kay Christensen vs Kirsten Mau / Lisa Escalante6-1, 6-0
2021-04-26vs HV SILVERWon 32
L#1 DoublesRhonda Buder / Katherine Flahive vs Anna Larsen / Monica Reidelbach2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Jean Mortellaro7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Routh / Jonna Mulqueen vs Dana Chorpenning / Charlotte Brady6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDawn Wolf vs Elena Ellcessor6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Wendy Liu vs Laurie Korff / Carrie Romine7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-19vs SSH YELLOWWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatherine Flahive / Kristin Campbell vs Amy Wesselink / Kathy Aarnio6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMary DuBois vs Shamiree Dillman7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatsy Botts / Tracy Sickels vs Kathi Engelken / Susan Canetto6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDawn Wolf vs Crystal Clark6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKay Christensen / Rhonda Buder vs Jill Arnold / Jennifer Lobb6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Laura Routh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Jonna Mulqueen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.43
Tracy Sickels
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Dawn Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Katherine Flahive
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Lorie Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary DuBois
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Patsy Botts
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Buder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Sickels + Rhonda Buder3256% games+5.9% vs expected
Laura Routh + Jonna Mulqueen11460% games+5.9% vs expected
Rhonda Buder + Kay Christensen381658% games+4.0% vs expected
Katherine Flahive + Dawn Wolf4253% games+1.5% vs expected
Patsy Botts + Tracy Sickels4450% games−1.4% vs expected
Patsy Botts + Katherine Flahive2742% games−7.0% vs expected
Tracy Sickels + Kay Christensen4456% games−8.3% vs expected
Tracy Sickels + Laura Routh404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Routh
139W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Jonna Mulqueen
107W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3
Tracy Sickels
59W–95L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.43
Dawn Wolf
17W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katherine Flahive
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kay Christensen
46W–26L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lorie Whalen
18W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary DuBois
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patsy Botts
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rhonda Buder
78W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.