Teams

CV-Rancho La Quinta/Girling

2024 SCTA SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Men's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/T SloanLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Querrey / John Thekkethala vs Michael Estanol / Duane Chernow2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-24vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/TerharWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Medzegian / John Thekkethala vs Brad Nelson / Glen Stock6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDennis Howey / Don Greenman vs Barry Cooper / Garrett Mullen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDon Gillen / Dennis Howey vs Bradley Dworkin / Dey Martin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Thekkethala / Don Greenman vs Farshid Yadegar / Stephen Hamilton3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJim Hogan / Paul Ouimet vs Charles Beckman / Steve Clark7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDon Gillen / Dave Girling vs Hector Calderon / Brian Flowers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDon Greenman / Mike Querrey vs Richard Rojko / Howard Levine6-0, 6-3
2024-10-25vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/TerharWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Howey / Bill Skilton vs Paul Cain / Roger Davis6-3, 7-6
2024-10-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Thekkethala / Paul Ouimet vs Michael Gardner / Andrew Cohen6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jeffrey Medzegian
published
3.57
Don Gillen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Bill Skilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Dennis Howey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dave Girling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Don Greenman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Thekkethala
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kemp Buononato
published
Mike Querrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Ouimet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Thekkethala + Bill Skilton5453% gamesnot enough data
John Thekkethala + Kemp Buononato213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Medzegian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Don Gillen
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Bill Skilton
55W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dennis Howey
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Dave Girling
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Don Greenman
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
John Thekkethala
30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kemp Buononato
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Querrey
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Paul Ouimet
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.