Teams

CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/Terhar

2024 SCTA SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Men's 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-01vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/T SloanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaul Cain / Brad Nelson vs Michael Estanol / Paul Morton2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Glen Stock vs Duane Chernow / Robert Wilkinson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-24vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/GirlingLost 02
L#2 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Kemp Buononato / Jim Hogan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarry Cooper / Garrett Mullen vs Dennis Howey / Don Greenman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Davis / Garrett Mullen vs Peter Hoffmann / Farshid Yadegar7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBarry Cooper / Garrett Mullen vs Charles Beckman / Hector Calderon1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Cain / BILL TERHAR vs Larry Martin / Steve Clark4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarry Cooper / Garrett Mullen vs Charles Beckman / Howard Levine7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Cain / Cesar Vallejo vs Hector Calderon / Brian Flowers6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesBarry Cooper / Garrett Mullen vs Michael Gardner / Todd Tucker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-27vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/T SloanLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Randy Diamond / Michael Estanol5-7, 3-6
2024-10-25vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/GirlingLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Dennis Howey / Bill Skilton3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Garrett Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Barry Cooper
published 3.5
3.12
Glen Stock
published 3.5
3.07
Cesar Vallejo
published 3.5
2.77
BILL TERHAR
published 3
Paul Cain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roger Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Cain + Roger Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Garrett Mullen
42W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Barry Cooper
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Glen Stock
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cesar Vallejo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
BILL TERHAR
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Paul Cain
20W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Davis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.