Teams

FCCC

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-24vs WYOWon 20
W#1 DoublesApril Walden / Dierdre Sadeh vs Cheryl Johnson / Dodi Campbell6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Knape / Robin Bachelet vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Sharon Buccino6-2, 7-6
2021-06-17vs HMTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Dierdre Sadeh vs Mel Fernandez / Debra Lukasiewicz6-0, 6-4
2021-06-10vs TAGWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynn Clay / Dierdre Sadeh vs Judy O'Gorman / Rachel Robertson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesApril Walden / Kelsey Nosler vs Cheri Gipson / Mary Wilson6-3, 7-5
2021-06-03vs MLFLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Anderson / April Walden vs Annette Vizena / Erin Hauser-Roe2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Bachelet / Jill Hartman vs Trudy Samuelson / Rachel Levalley5-7, 3-6
2021-05-27vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesRobin Bachelet / Lynn Clay vs Becca Fitzpatrick / Melissa Seager2-6, 4-6
2021-05-20vs CSULost 01
L#2 DoublesRobin Bachelet / Kelsey Nosler vs Wendy Clark / Tonya Motley2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
April Walden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Jill Hartman
published
Carolyn Knape
published 4
3.71
Dierdre Sadeh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Robin Bachelet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Lynn Clay
published
3.44
Kelsey Nosler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Melinda Blatt
published
KELLY KHAN
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dierdre Sadeh + KELLY KHAN3355% games+2.2% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Kelsey Nosler2545% games−0.1% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Robin Bachelet2547% games−0.5% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + April Walden81248% games−12.3% vs expected
April Walden + Robin Bachelet3252% gamesnot enough data
Kelsey Nosler + April Walden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Walden
102W–76L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
Jill Hartman
42W–36L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Carolyn Knape
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dierdre Sadeh
67W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Robin Bachelet
56W–98L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lynn Clay
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Kelsey Nosler
94W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.44
Melinda Blatt
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
KELLY KHAN
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.