Teams

KHuffstetler Singles

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-28vs MGreenLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Ashley Walton6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesWendy Bargoil vs Marilyn Slaymaker0-6, 0-6
2022-07-23Split 11
L#2 SinglesKate Rigsbee vs Lisa Austin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Liz Fischer6-0, 6-2
2022-07-20Won 20
W#1 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKate Rigsbee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-08vs NRodriguezSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKelly Huffstetler vs Cassie Pence1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesShannon Beach vs Jessica Segall6-2, 6-2
2022-07-07vs CBurrWon 10
W#1 SinglesShannon Beach vs Christine Burr7-6, 6-4
2022-06-22vs AndrewsCCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesShannon Beach vs Kathleen Warren1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKate Rigsbee vs Julianne Andrews1-6, 0-6
2022-06-15vs ISLittletonLost 02
L#2 SinglesShannon Beach vs Holly Atkinson4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKate Rigsbee vs Julie Dougherty1-6, 0-6
2022-06-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKate Rigsbee vs Callie Ward2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Katherine Canavan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Shannon Beach
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Emily Rubin
published 3
2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.74
Molly Clark
published
2.63
Wendy Bargoil
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.57
Kelly Huffstetler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Kate Rigsbee
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Clark + Wendy Bargoil5250% games−2.3% vs expected
Wendy Bargoil + Kate Rigsbee5455% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Huffstetler + Katherine Canavan3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Canavan
180W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Shannon Beach
97W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3
Emily Rubin
19W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.10
Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Molly Clark
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Wendy Bargoil
48W–86L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Kelly Huffstetler
84W–118L career · 1 line in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Kate Rigsbee
33W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.