Teams

ISLittleton

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-27vs AndrewsCCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Kathleen Warren0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Lorah Henry7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-07-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Callie Ward6-2, 6-3
2022-07-13vs MGreenWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Tori Schoen6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Melissa Green6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs Marilyn Slaymaker4-6, 5-7
2022-07-06vs JHENSLEYSplit 11
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Gillian Bowles3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Khelsey Lemon6-0, 6-0
2022-06-29vs HochstrasserWon 30
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Christa Hochstrasser6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Leslie Taylor6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-22Split 11
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs Anne-Claire DenHartog3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-15vs KHuffstetler SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Shannon Beach6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs CBurrWon 10
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Lynelle Clark6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Julie Dougherty
published
3.49
Shannon Littleton
published
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Katelyn Applegate
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty12957% games+3.2% vs expected
Holly Atkinson + Katelyn Applegate5357% gamesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dougherty + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dougherty
49W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Shannon Littleton
38W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–127L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Katelyn Applegate
87W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.