Teams

LCTA18/Gerber/MPR

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 4.0 - Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 4.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Cassandra Goyal
published 4
3.75
Janine Dalva
published
3.70
Wendy Sharp
published
3.64
Debra Mulholland
published 4
3.52
Becky Montgomery
published 4
3.45
Charlotte Gerber
published 4
3.31
Hollis Barbaro
published 3.5
3.25
Christiane Jones
published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Dudley
published
Nancy Shannon
published
Rebecca Williamson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Montgomery + Debra Mulholland4455% games+5.8% vs expected
Charlotte Gerber + Debra Mulholland3355% games+5.3% vs expected
Genevieve McCutcheon + Charlotte Gerber252052% games−0.4% vs expected
Rebecca Williamson + Wendy Sharp9458% games−2.6% vs expected
Nancy Dudley + Debra Mulholland5450% games−4.5% vs expected
Rebecca Williamson + Janine Dalva14557% games−6.3% vs expected
Rebecca Williamson + Debra Mulholland2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Rebecca Williamson + Christiane Jones4549% games−9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Genevieve McCutcheon
62W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Cassandra Goyal
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janine Dalva
50W–29L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Wendy Sharp
49W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Debra Mulholland
69W–65L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Becky Montgomery
44W–54L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
4
Charlotte Gerber
63W–77L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Hollis Barbaro
35W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christiane Jones
97W–139L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Nancy Dudley
47W–35L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Nancy Shannon
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Williamson
45W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.