Teams

Davidson/Paik-All the Single Ladies

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
CHRISTINE McNair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Heather Dale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Caroline Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2025-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Paik / Heather Dale vs Genelynne Jian / Madison Scully7-5, 6-3
2025-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davidson / Heather Dale vs Cricket Forsey / Lucila Griesser6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCHRISTINE McNair / Heather Dale vs Dianna Kaady / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-4, 6-1
2025-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davidson / Heather Davidson vs Kitty Bozzini / Diana Kessler6-2, 6-3
2025-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Dale / Heather Davidson vs Hannah Riley / Paddy McShane6-3, 6-1
2025-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davidson / CHRISTINE McNair vs Erin Mader / Christina Bergstrom7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
CHRISTINE McNair
60W–68L career
0%11%89%
3.25
3
Heather Dale
94W–94L career
0%89%11%
2.96
3
Caroline Davidson
22W–36L career
0%94%6%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.