Teams

CV-Andalusia/ R Conn

2026 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-23vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P TerharLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Mercante / Janet Gallagher vs Jill Delaney / PATTY TERHAR6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoyce Medford / Anne Azzu vs Marti Jablon / Patrice Jackson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Sims / Lori Kilburn vs Georgia Powell / Ava Schumacher6-7, 3-6
2026-05-16vs CV-IRCC/MorinLost 03
L#1 DoublesTobi Schneider / Jessica Berkovitz vs Susan Brooks / Carrie Morton1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Roethenmund / Debra Creem vs Elizabeth Huey / Jennifer Bouffard2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLori Kilburn / Mary Morrison vs Elizabeth Hester / Deborah Beutler2-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs CV-Del Webb RM/Fox & TennysonLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Mercante / Jessica Berkovitz vs Janet Dunlap / Maureen Jaramillo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Sims / Monica Harrington vs Kaprece Walker / Ann Tennyson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Sigrist / Mary Morrison vs Ann Robinow / Obsidiana Abril-Horpel2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBeth Mercante / Janet Gallagher vs Cathy Long / Tammy Pronenko5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Harrington / Debra Creem vs Heather Black / Paula Buononato2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLori Kilburn / Danielle Sigrist vs Joann Bailin / Julee Moore0-6, 2-6
2026-04-29vs CV-IRCC/MorinLost 02
L#2 DoublesMonica Harrington / Tammy Kitterman vs Elizabeth Huey / Shannon McFarlin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Morrison / Linda Sims vs Elizabeth Hester / Christina Strigenz2-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P TerharLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Taylor / Joyce Medford vs Mona Knudslien / Annie Schwartz0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Creem / Tammy Kitterman vs Jill Delaney / Patrice Jackson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Morrison / Lori Kilburn vs Judith Feinerman / Ava Schumacher4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBeth Mercante / Janet Gallagher vs Cathy Long / Mistie Iseman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Medford / Anne Azzu vs Hilary Quinn / Heather Black0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Sims / Danielle Sigrist vs Tatjana Mullally / Joann Bailin4-6, 3-6
2026-04-04vs CV-Del Webb RM/Fox & TennysonLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Mercante / Debra Creem vs Lisa Hulsman / Brooke Russo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Sims / Lori Kilburn vs Mary Fox / Ann Tennyson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Morrison / Holly Wong vs Kelly Walecki / Jean MacHiz5-7, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Jessica Berkovitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Beth Mercante
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Janet Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Tobi Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Joyce Medford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Tammy Kitterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Monica Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Debra Creem
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Lori Kilburn
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Mary Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Linda Sims
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Anne Azzu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.20
Danielle Sigrist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Helen Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Gallagher + Beth Mercante123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Berkovitz
106W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Beth Mercante
32W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Janet Gallagher
31W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Tobi Schneider
82W–96L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Joyce Medford
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Tammy Kitterman
11W–17L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Monica Harrington
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.14
3.5
Debra Creem
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Lori Kilburn
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Mary Morrison
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.89
Linda Sims
7W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.79
3
Anne Azzu
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Danielle Sigrist
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Helen Taylor
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Holly Wong
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.