Search

Tammy Kitterman

Vancouver, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
28 matches · 11W–17L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
3%
stay 3.5
97%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 34% stay · 66% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Lower than today’s 3.65 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
1 of 39
WA · 3.5
7 of 1209

Tammy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams39 teams · 2012–2026
CV-Andalusia/ R Conn
2026 Scta Mixed Tri-Level - CV · CV-4.0/3.5/3.0
2026
CV-Andalusia/ R Conn
2026 Scta Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0/3.5/3.0
2026
CGM-Geisler/Blunt
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
CGM-Blunt
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
CV-Indian Wells TG/Sherri Nickerson
2023 Scta Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0/3.5/3.0
2023
CGM-Geisler
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tammy has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192021202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.5% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.6% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
L
Brian Christ / Evie Seifumixed
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Sigrist
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Larsen
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Elizabeth Huey / Shannon McFarlin
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Harrington
0.051below expectation — took 45% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jill Delaney / Patrice Jackson
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Creem
0.044below expectation — took 57% of games against 70% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Maria Kosmetatos / Edwin LIEW-FERGUSONmixed
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Sims
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-06-22 · CGM-Blunt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Hutley
0.026below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-10-15 · CGM-Geisler/Blunt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramona Kirsch
0.007about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-09-30 · CGM-Geisler/Blunt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Hutley
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Julie Arness / Karen Walker
2023-09-17 · CGM-Geisler/Blunt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Hutley
0.054below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Patrice Jackson / Denise Roethenmund
2023-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francesca Hitselberger
0.024below expectation — took 58% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-11-20 · CGM-Geisler · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Blunt
0.066below expectation — took 43% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-09-25 · CGM-Geisler · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan McMullin
0.100below expectation — took 8% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.