← Search

Rebecca Harris

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Rebecca Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2025-03-15 · SHC-Christensen/Vedder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rozita Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-08 · SHC-Christensen/Vedder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Slominski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-05-31 · SHC-Christensen/Vedder · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Trujillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-28 · SHC-Christensen/Vedder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliza Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2023-10-15 · SHC-Macdonald/Welter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-16 · SHC-Macdonald/Welter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Janna McDougall / Robin Fernstrom
2023-05-13 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Vedder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-05-07 · SHC-Dehoog/Putnam · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Pacioni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-04-30 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliza Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-04-23 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Slominski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-15 · SHC-Dehoog/Putnam · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pierre Burthey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-02-04 · SHC-Dehoog/Putnam · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2002–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.2% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert