← Search

Eliza Oh

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
30 matches · 10W–20L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Eliza sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Eliza is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eliza has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023, 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Eliza has gone from the 16th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
L
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Slominski
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Rudinsky
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Trujillo
−0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Trujillo
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Harris
+0.020better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Sarah Larson / Karen Kraus
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Slominski
−0.064below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Harris
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jordan
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jennifer Johnson / Rachel Ritchie
2023-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Slominski
−0.065below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Schaub
−0.010below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Anglin
+0.031better than expected — took 42% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Anglin
−0.060below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.