← Search

Casey Billings

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
64 matches · 49W–15L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Casey sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Casey is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Casey has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Casey has gone from the 89th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 68.9% of games
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.8% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 64.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
W
2022-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Vanderploeg
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manuel Garcia-Fernandez
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Vanderploeg
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Casi
−0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2022-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriela McIntosh
−0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriela McIntosh
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Vendegna
−0.075below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Vendegna
−0.031below expectation — took 58% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-04-03 · #3 Doubles · with Gabriela McIntosh
−0.039below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-01 · #1 Doubles · with Gabriela McIntosh
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Stromquist
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jin Velasco
+0.093better than expected — took 40% of games against 9% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.