← Search

Shawn Cellura Radford

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
39 matches · 27W–12L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Shawn sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Shawn is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shawn has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Shawn has gone from the 83rd to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.5% of games
7.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 61.9% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
W
2023-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
−0.050below expectation — took 48% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Debra Hall / Jing Li
2023-09-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Hall
+0.023better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
−0.021below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
−0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Bernhardt
−0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Bachhuber
+0.038better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Laney
−0.039below expectation — took 38% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rico McIver
−0.032below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Whitsell
+0.066better than expected — took 57% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Barbara Pasmore / Christine Hattenhauer
2022-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Wright
−0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Bachhuber
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Susan Judge / Christine Keefer
2022-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.