Teams

AH: Dow

2024 RI Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-24vs RP: MaggiacomoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / Robert Spear vs Scott Racine / Neal Rainey3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDouglas Emanuel / Oliver Dow vs Edward Maggiacomo / Stephen Collins0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Damon / Jeff Diehl vs Douglas Gray / Richard Graumann6-3, 6-0
2024-07-18vs FC: TraversLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / William Binder vs Kenneth Savatdy / Stu Yang2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Emanuel / Oliver Dow vs Warren Mowry / Michael Robinson2-6, 6-3, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Damon / Edwin Gorham vs Joseph Travers / Antonio Pinto0-6, 6-4, 5-3
2024-07-10vs CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwinLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / Robert Spear vs Neal Manchester / Donald Marrin4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesNeil Damon / Douglas Emanuel vs Stephen Valk / Bill Gordon1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Ditmars / James Bush vs David Axelson / David Sardinha3-6, 4-6
2024-06-26vs RP: MaggiacomoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / William Binder vs MICHAEL FONTAINE / Phil Ricci1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEdwin Gorham / Jeff Diehl vs Andrew Margolin / Ed Losiewicz6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDouglas Emanuel / James Bush vs Scott Racine / Edward Maggiacomo4-6, 6-3, 2-4
2024-06-24vs CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwinWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / Robert Spear vs Neal Manchester / Mark McGwin III6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNeil Damon / Jeff Diehl vs Bill Gordon / David Axelson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesOliver Dow / James Bush vs David Sardinha / David Gwizdowski6-2, 7-5
2024-06-12vs FC: TraversWon 21
L#1 DoublesOliver Dow / James Bush vs Kenneth Savatdy / Craig Cameron0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNeil Damon / Jeff Diehl vs Joseph Travers / Jonathan Bell7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Horwitz / Robert Spear vs Michael Gorman / Thomas McCaffrey6-0, 6-1
2024-06-10vs CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwinLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Binder / James Bush vs Neal Manchester / Donald Marrin1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNeil Damon / Jeff Diehl vs Bill Gordon / Stephen Valk6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDouglas Ditmars / Edwin Gorham vs Mark McGwin III / Mark Bichajian6-1, 2-6, 4-6
2024-05-30vs RP: MaggiacomoLost 03
L#1 DoublesOliver Dow / Robert Spear vs Stephen Collins / Manny Pacheco4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Bush / Jeff Diehl vs Edward Maggiacomo / Phil Ricci3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEdwin Gorham / Douglas Ditmars vs Peter B Miller / Douglas Gray3-6, 7-5, 1-2
2024-05-28vs FC: TraversLost 03
L#1 DoublesDouglas Emanuel / Neil Damon vs Kenneth Savatdy / Stu Yang1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Diehl / James Bush vs Warren Mowry / Michael Robinson2-6, 6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobert Spear / William Binder vs Kory Campbell / Peter Alba1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Andrew Horwitz
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Douglas Ditmars
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Douglas Emanuel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Edwin Gorham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
James Bush
published
Jeff Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Neil Damon
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Oliver Dow
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Robert Spear
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
William Binder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Ditmars + Edwin Gorham7357% gamesnot enough data
Neil Damon + Jeff Diehl4354% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Gorham + Jeff Diehl5257% gamesnot enough data
Neil Damon + Andrew Horwitz2451% gamesnot enough data
Neil Damon + Edwin Gorham2445% gamesnot enough data
Robert Spear + Andrew Horwitz1543% gamesnot enough data
James Bush + Andrew Horwitz4162% gamesnot enough data
Neil Damon + Douglas Ditmars224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Horwitz
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Douglas Ditmars
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Douglas Emanuel
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Edwin Gorham
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Bush
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Diehl
24W–27L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Neil Damon
30W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Oliver Dow
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Spear
8W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Binder
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.